| LoFi version for PDAs |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll |
| mott.carl |
Posted: Sep 22 2006, 09:01 PM
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1435 Joined: 26-August 06 Positive Feedback: 35% Feedback Score: -123 |
http://www.physorg.com/news78071497.html
then the bh aren"t more black?then the the speed of this stars are greater that light speed?then there is the anti-gravity?or there is something of wrong with the theories of bh? karla motta karlamotta@pop.com.br |
|
Send PM · Send email ·
|
| Neil Farbstein |
Posted: Sep 23 2006, 06:44 AM
|
||
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1174 Joined: 25-October 05 Positive Feedback: 41.03% Feedback Score: -65 |
BH is raving lunatic -------------------- Life is a tale told by an idiot full of sound and fury; signifying nothing...Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow, but tomorrow never comes. -William Shakespeare.
|
||
|
Send PM · Send email ·
|
| Shemi |
Posted: Sep 23 2006, 05:44 PM
|
|
Unregistered |
It means they have now better simulated the ejection of stars from the center of the galaxy (ones that came so close that when they continued in their orbit the "slingshot effect" threw them out of the galaxy). The stars would not need to get close in human terms to the BH, only close enough to achieve the required acceleration to reach the galaxy or at least the local area's escape velocity. (1. the star was simulated 2. the star did not enter the event horizon 3. the star at no point traveled faster than light) This article isn't all that significant except it says basically that we can now better simulate gravitational interactions in the galaxy.
|
|
|
|
Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll |