Scientific Forums


 

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


> good reason to hunt animals to extinction, Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news76096852.html
bugmenot
Posted: Aug 30 2006, 06:07 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 6-August 04

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 1


http://www.physorg.com/news76096852.html

So each time a animal gets to the top of hill it feasts on the animals below it. Not a very suprising thing, but clearly it support man hunting to extinction every other animal possible, who knows by doing so you may be protecting future generation of mankind from killer seas and snail darters that may evolve in the the future.
Top
rpenner
Posted: Aug 30 2006, 06:49 PM


Fully Wired
*****

Group: Moderators
Posts: 5494
Joined: 27-December 04

Positive Feedback: 84.5%
Feedback Score: 397


People should know the meaning of non sequitur before posting their inferences.


--------------------
愛平兎仏主
"And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus." Philippians 4:7
It's just good Netiquette. Failing that, Chlorpromazine.
Top
Your fellow human (yfh)
Posted: Aug 30 2006, 07:43 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 6-November 05

Positive Feedback: 94.12%
Feedback Score: 20


Hi.

Think and be wise. wink.gif

Hunting is different then warfare.

Animals are hunted for food. If over-hunted, the humans "root out the oak tree".

Exterminations, sanitation and pestasides are examples of warfare against another species.

Humans raising livestock is an example of humanity encouraging population-growth of a certain species for the sake of humanity's own good.

Humanity's deeper damages towards other species has to do with over-consuming and waste. If this gets "too bad" it will start to damage the economics of the biosphere's balance.

Thanks for reading.


--------------------
No more sigs for now...
Top
bugmenot
Posted: Aug 30 2006, 08:03 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 85
Joined: 6-August 04

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 1


rpenner, some people should know the meaning of the word humor before reading.
Top
Upisoft
Posted: Aug 30 2006, 08:28 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 727
Joined: 14-December 05

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 3


QUOTE (bugmenot @ Aug 30 2006, 11:03 PM)
rpenner, some people should know the meaning of the word humor before reading.

laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif


--------------------
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."
Albert Einstein
Top
Steve Reames
Posted: Aug 31 2006, 02:47 AM


Unregistered









Sorry but man at the most s only seven to 10 thousand years old. The dinos were here at the same time as Adam
Top
AssumeNothing
Posted: Aug 31 2006, 04:56 AM


Unregistered









Perhaps the underlying study addresses this, but it is not clear why the researcher assumed that the either the modern day monkeys or the Taung child were killed by the eagles. Eagles are scavengers and will eat whatever is easy, including carrion. See, e.g., animal diversity web at UMich. The monkeys and Taung child could have been killed by something else (disease, other predators) and later scavenged by the eagles.
Top

Topic Options

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


 

Terms of use