"TOE" Theory Of Everything Cracked, Gravity and EMF and String calculus

Here is the following media release..

Theory Of Everything Cracked!

Before one proceeds into the absolute basics of how Gravitational and Electromotive forces have been amalgamated let me refer to the basis of my reasoning and necessary calculus so that one may also be enlightened by ones very own calculus.

Previously, one had worked with five functional equations, which dealt with 11 variables, now to those that have and are still playing around with such calculus, may have instantly recognized what one has referred to, and had one mentioned 5 representations and or flavors leading to M theory which involves those 11 dimensions, Most String Theorists would now be hooked with keen interest with out considering why one has termed Variables over Dimensions.

Read one’s previous statement again as obviously the way one has expressed it was for a very good reason as one may find it difficult to comprehend such a concept possible, Err~ Let’s hope one has clarified some concerns without confusing anyone by ones constructs thus far.


Before proceeding any further we need to get the rest of the scientific community up to speed with what one may have been grappling with, and in doing so perhaps shed some electromagnetic waves Err~ Light on what is yet another problem to most if not correctly addressed as to how and why “c” the constant that refers to the maximum speed of electromagnetic propagation, commonly referred to as the speed of Light and note one has deliberately preceded with ones wording for good reason as well.
And no! It’s not because of the current contradiction to some ever increasing expansion of our universe, although if one considers how “c” came to be, the obvious should be that our universe is not expanding at an ever-increasing rate, and in fact is NOT expanding at all! And this will be Err~ expanded on and clarified by further reading or perhaps via familiarity with theories entailing electromagnetic transmissions.


FORWARD.

Let us draw two large circles and define to them a set quantum.
We also should state the circles drawn represent spheres that are the same in dimension to each other.
Further more let us state these spheres are equal in quanta to our universe or should we choose to, to a given portion or percentage of the whole Universe. Noting the Whole Universe may not be currently pertaining to a spherical shape let alone a flattened one, although messing around with these spherical dimensions based on Physical laws gives for some really interesting results that just may be the case!

Moving on let us state that the first quantum or sphere defines moment one. Imagine one encapsulating and freezing Area/time and being able to apply means of calculus to it by divvying or dividing it to areas.

Let us state that the second quantum defines moment two. Note if this sphere and or quanta is a partial component or portion of the universe, Time reference or data is a little more involved and therefore the snapshot of Area/time may not be relative to our observation point of time “unrelative” pronounced “un-re-late-ive” that’s if the Time rates are different, to which this second sphere should then reflect what data was availed to a time reference and hence should be defined accordingly proportionally smaller, taking into careful consideration the rate of data availed to time at our observing locality which is governed by the same rule, So for simplicities sake for now this exercise will conform to current constructs of time used in current calculus in every day science, so it will remain the same quanta as the first moments data availed to time because we have remained relative to the sphere or to the whole Universes time reference or moments. Whew what a mouth full! And if not fully understood may need re reading it!

So imagine encapsulating and freezing Area/time dimension without considering Times accruing data and its rate of data being availed back to the universe via momentum if one is dealing with a percentage or portion of the Universe.

So for simplicities sake let us now state each sphere represents two snap shots of Area/time of the universe.

Let us now portion or define the two snap shots of time references into some components, portions and or dimensions of whatever variables one wishes to work with, keeping in mind we are dealing with more than just two dimensions if we treat the Circles as Spheres and or as real time.

For those individuals that have dealt with String Theory one may wish to Portion ones spheres or Universe accordingly to proceed ones calculus using your favored equation to both moments by giving some indication of change or momentum to the plotting points that define ones current string/s.

Having allowed String theorist the luxury of partial first glory, the rest of the scientific community can now define portions and or variables to each snapshot of our universe pertaining to changes of state from area to area, and if we are to express changes, the portions from the first instance must then be different to the second moment of our universe. In doing so we must do two things and note that these changes suggest movement, momentum or force with some unity to all momentum, and hence a set amount of time frames or references need to be considered “more spheres or snap shots!” just in order to express this movement via calculus more accurately, It is my hope this brings some insight gained from ones earlier inference of time being variable via given velocity to given mass.

But what has all this to do with the THEORY OF EVERYTHING?
The new dimension or rigid quanta introduced via the aforementioned into String theory is part of the key. But not the whole key of what we are dealing with, it only gives rise to a finite and an unchanging dimension for our Universe.
That along with depicting the universe at the very least in two moments as to why it works, importantly we now can do calculus that gives rise to momentum representing change which is about to lead us to ask if we are truly adhering to a rigid rule that concerns Time? Re-read ones earlier statements with respect to relativity and how important this is when one reasons what the speed of Light infers.

So far we have implied the universe is finite and what’s more, influences beyond it cannot change it, besides there is nothing left! Because everything has been assumed as part of the Universe, including time! Should we discover more to the universe all we need do is add more dimensions to our current Model. Hence we exist in a closed system and what’s more no matter how many variables and or dimensions we work with we can still precisely predict and apply calculus to it all as long as we apply a rigid rule in that,

If time is to accrue Data in order the Universe may exist by some record, All dimensions or “variables” that we define on what truly does exist, all must avail a portion “%” “or small image of its changing states” to the time reference and this suggests, as the Time reference accrues this Data “or images” of changes, The time references “image” involved must also avail or communicate back to the universe an image, and it is this reason why a Klein Bottle plotting is used to express these changes to our universe in order to simplify all the dynamics! Read the previous paragraph in bold a few times, as it takes some getting use to, one also highly recommends one study Klein Bottle plotting if one really needs to understand the universes full dynamics and forces that pertains to mass, force and the perception of gravity.

Getting back to our circles or Spheres that represent our universe with the respective portions that we have defined via known physical laws, Has any one noticed the implications with respects to times portion and the various possible implications if we apply the rule that all variables or dimensions MUST avail information to time, including time itself must avail data of its accruing changes back to the universe? Some serious shrinking is implied.

In the real world, time goes by and as changes occur, times quanta or data accrues and hence must increase times quanta or record taking up a greater and greater portion of the Universe, but this implies every portion or dimension must concede to times increasing quanta or portion, but if we are to truly deal with a finite quantum or quanta to the Universe as a closed system, this would be problematic if we don’t concede that time must portion itself back or avail its information or data back to the Universe, so if we apply the same rigid Rule to Time but rather Time avails its data to the universe we complete and now adhere in the end to the rule of energy is not gained nor lost but rather is exchanged via momentum from area to area leading to our perception of Mass, Force, Gravity Charge and Time.


Perhaps some insight may be gained if we are to concede that our local area is availing to time due to data being dependant on change and hence local rate of data availed to Time being of a differing ratio to where we may be observing, and to prove this we need to observe beyond our local area and the further away from the Black Hole as a given time reference the more dramatic the ratio should be, to where a result of an increasing rate of expansion seems to be occurring, when in fact our local area has availed much more data to the time reference and or in real terms our galaxies centre than what the observed area other than in our galaxy has, hence it is proportionally with less momentum and or velocity to our time reference, now let us apply some plots to our Klein Bottle model to better understand this involving reasoning, or we may simply envision to be situated as such in real time to such a momentum or velocity where it seems we are indeed entering a neck of a Klein Bottle or to some inward momentum of our galaxy, which interestingly so happens we have a Black Hole conforming perfectly to ones plotting points of an extremely twisted and complex Klein Bottle neck, Err~ to which you may have to resort to calculus anyway if curious of its functional form pertaining to a Black Holes dynamics as being our current time reference, which if not considered as part of our calculus one will never lead one to electromotive forces and the true momentums to the area that refers to the humble Atom.

Well, the AWT uses just a single parameter (speed of light c) and only two equations (, ).

This post has been edited by Zephir on Aug 30 2006, 08:33 AM

I have been working on a similar concept but allowing for a small acceleration in the rate that time passes. The acceleration is due to the expansion of the universe (which reduces its overall density and hence its gravitational field). The manner in which time accelerates is described by the Fractal Equation: T-tp ↔ T

Where T is the present moment in time and tp is Planck Time, this means each second (or other unit of time) is tp or 10-43 seconds (or other unit of time) smaller than the preceding second (or other unit of time). Therefore time cannot flow smoothly but ticks along in a series of tiny little clicks and that each moment is 10-43 smaller than the preceding moment. Time is quantized.

It seems to account for a number of parameters that need to be added to other theories to make them fit observations.

If one considers "c" with respects to speed via the following mediums..
Solid
Liquid
Gas
and Near vacuum where we now are treating the span from one area of mass to another area as spanning far greater distances to when we compare it to a solid, we must therefore concede that the constant "c" is dictated by this distance..

You are aware that the constant "c" is much lower in a solid are you not?
And or how about the reason why a magnetic field behaves the way it does because of this velocity difference giving us the perception of north and south Poles.

Lets turn our attention back to maximum speed of propagation and imagine if the universe were expanding what do you think "c" would be doing?

you would be correct to reason that it would have to increase along with the universes expansion.

The constant "c" has remained constant so therefore the universe is not expanding...

Lets do something wild
lets say our whole area is being stripped by the centre of our galaxy where a Black hole exists, and lets say this Black hole is our time refrence, now lets do something even much wilder and consider everything is not atoms but rather areas with certain forces that suggest charge and what not..

Now as everything moves into the black hole it becomes part of the Black hole, lets go briefly back to what we would measure and experience and to us it would seem that the unviverse is expanding, and whats more the more we shrink the faster this expansion seems to get.

Now if one goes back to my first post one should see that the Black hole which is just one time reference of many in the universe they too~ must avail back to the universe in conformance to a closed systems rule.

To calculate this we need to plot our course or future to a klein Bottle model, which leads us to that single equation to everything and anything!

Zephir?

I tried answering your post earlier, but for some reason every time I tried it crashed my explorer.

what I wanted to ask was, Does your two equations amalgamate Gravity and EMF the same way a single equation via the use of time references being applied to the converted "EMF" and Gravity to manageable dimension and or variable?

If so Dam!

what a friggin waste of three decades! Eh! it was fun anyway <whimper away>

Try to use Firefox instead... (Just kidding, I'm Microsoft patriotic and I have never problem with this forum in Internet Explorer, you're describing...).

Concerning your question, these two equations describing the oscillation of the string, where the energy density corresponds the mass density of string in each moment and location.

Such string makes itself spontaneously more & more dense via mutual phase transforms, until the number of dimension reaches the supremum of Lagrangian dependence. This is why the vacuum is the most stable and common phase of Aether (see the surface volume ratio of multidimensional hypersphere bellow, you should click to the pictures to see it in original resolution)

At this moment the Aether looks like the dense 3D foam composed from another 3D foam. And the light is using a membranes of this foam for energy wave spreading. You can imagine the vacuum formation like the condensation of supercritical water vapor in isochoric conditions. During this an intimate mixture of liquid and gaseous phase appears, where the mechanical waves are transfered along a surfaces of resulting foam (note the frame No. 5 on the animation bellow).



As you probably know, the energy spreading prefers the surfaces: during underwater explosions most the energy spreads itself along water surface. This is because the water is less compressible, then air and the air is less dense than water. At this point, the vacuum condensate behaves like the common matter, like the intimate mixture of droplets, be more specific. And the light spreads itself along internal surfaces of this mixture via transversal waves (see the animation on the right).

OK, but what's the gravity, after than? The behavior of bubbles in vacuum foam is driven by so called surface tension. Like I've told, most the energy spreads along curved surfaces of such foam. And the energy corresponds the matter density. And the matter motion is driven by Newton inertia law: it tries to spread along a most straight path possible. As the result, the internal surfaces of foam are having a pronounced tendency to decrease its curvature. In the mixture of bubbles of different average bubble size the density leveling tendency would appear, similar to the diffusion: this is the gravity by the AWT model.

You needn't to worry about wasted time in developing of more specific theories, because the model of Universe described above is quite common and difficult to compute. For example, we don't use the quantum mechanic for computation of spirit density during mixing with water, because more specific & simpler theory exists for such particular purpose. By such way, the AWT isn't very effective for real life computation, but it can be useful for explanation of very small particles or quite general cosmological processes, connected with Universe evolution.

This post has been edited by Zephir on Sep 2 2006, 08:08 AM

The reason that the speed of light is "slower" in a medium is because the photons are continually absorbed and re-emitted, they still travel at C between atoms.

The speed of light is constant for all observers but is dependent on the rate at which you measure time (V=d/t). In a frame of reference where time is not static the value of C will be dependent on your position in time, even C can be relative but it become complicated because time is relative too. We are working with a model in which there is no inertial frame.

If the universe is not expanding how do you account for Hubble's Constant? Or for that matter how do you perceive that we move forward in time? It is entropy (see the second law of thermo-dynamics) that creates the perception of time.

I don't believe this is necessarily the case.

Times would scale along with expansion. The significant differences would seem to be that forces wouldn't scale identically. So you'd perceive the same light distance and time, relative to internally expanded references, but the underlying forces would change, and at least if they aren't all related to the same 1/d^2 relationship (if the Casimir force is due to a double application of the same 1/d^2 scaling then this would also likely scale).

If angular momentum was conserved, you might find a frequency shift, though likely not velocity shift (orbital velocity falls off as 1/d^2, though orbital period scales differently ... maybe this is related to observed red-shifting? ... we're running more blue shifted now for orbital periods?).

At least for scaled sizes though, I don't believe light speed appears changed and posted something to this regard a bit ago also: http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...ndpost&p=120607

...

I agree very much with your view that moments in time are created by making differential measurements between "systems". In some cases these systems might even share components, but there's a movable boundary between each "observer" and the universe. Information passing across this threshold as it moves it what's sensed as time. So you could in a way envision the universe as rigid (and potentially infinite) and every observer as having their own "time cone" expanding, but not necessarily at light speed, but instead at the speed of time - discrete steps in space when objects interact, which is always the same rate for every observer - one event at a time (though the information content per event might vary).

I have a feeling there's a potentially infinite source of information things are "expanding" into from that perspective, though physically a lot might be recycled, the information contained in them isn't necessary entirely recycled ... I'm not too familiar with a Klein Bottle (though I believe it's similar to a mobius strip), but you could imagine most all the information cycling through it and each observer makes observations between fixed divisions within it, between themself and the rest, but I think there's an open end somewhere.

Consider at a minimum a reference for what "phase" or position the information is current shifted by within this space needs to exist .... what provides such a counter? The observer themself? But you can't make relative observations of yourself as it's a fixed identity and you always see the exact same thing. So this would need to exist an input to the system. Well as soon as you input this information into the system, now it's an observable part of the system, that eventually becomes part of an observer, once witnessed, so in order to maintain a perceived change, you always need to alter perspectives and that altered perspective can't come from within a closed system. So you'd need to have a continual and non-cyclic source of information entiring in to the system to truly create change.

I see this physically similar to an infinite space, where most the energy is maintained inward via reflections and slowed by interactions, but there's always a diffusion on the edges that continually exchanges information from outside the visible universe and this slowly propogates inward and creates time. The perceptions of time likely only occur when truly new information is present and doesn't exist when already entangled objects interact a second time as that second interaction conveys no more information, unless new information has been injected in between these to distinguish between the two prior events, but then the only thing really novel was the information provided by new marker in relationship to the prior information and not really an integral part of the prior information alone. (So if you had a string of 20 units of information describing an observer a new event might contain a single bit (0 or 1) of information, but it would also contain an additional 1 of 20 possible locations in which it could interact with the observer and so truly be seen as one of 40 possible discrete events, but once it's added, now you have 21 units of information and nothing to distinguish this from a steady state system without again adding an external reference etc. ... of course each one of these 21 units would have their own perspective of what transpired and could be different, but that's because of their own unique relationship to the other 20)

This post has been edited by StevenA on Sep 2 2006, 10:44 PM