Pesky Mankind Still Killing Our Planet!, Clipper ships DOOMED!

The vast loop of winds that drives climate and ocean behavior across the tropical Pacific has weakened by 3.5% since the mid-1800s, and it may weaken another 10% by 2100, according to a study led by University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) scientist Gabriel Vecchi. The study indicates that the only plausible explanation for the slowdown is human-induced climate change. The findings appear in the May 4 issue of Nature.

This diagram shows the Walker Circulation, a vast loop of air above the equatorial Pacific Ocean. See below for an alternate depiction. (Illustration by Gabriel Vecchi, UCAR.)

The Walker circulation, which spans almost half the circumference of Earth, pushes the Pacific Ocean's trade winds from east to west, generates massive rains near Indonesia, and nourishes marine life across the equatorial Pacific and off the South American coast. Changes in the circulation, which varies in tandem with El Niño and La Niña events, can have far–reaching effects.

"The Walker circulation is fundamental to climate across the globe," says Vecchi.

In their paper, "Weakening of Tropical Pacific Atmospheric Circulation Due to Anthropogenic Forcing," the authors used observations as well as state-of-the-art computer climate model simulations to verify the slowdown and determine whether the cause is human-induced climate change. The work was performed at NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), where Vecchi is stationed through the UCAR Visiting Scientist Programs. His coauthors include Brian Soden (University of Miami) and the GFDL team of Andrew Wittenberg, Isaac Held, Ants Leetmaa, and Matthew Harrison.

The Walker circulation takes the shape of a loop with rising air in the western tropical Pacific, sinking air in the eastern tropical Pacific, west-to-east winds a few miles high, and east-to-west trade winds at the surface. The trade winds also steer ocean currents. Any drop in winds produces an even larger reduction in wind-forced ocean flow—roughly twice as much in percentage terms for both the observed and projected changes, says Vecchi.

"This could have important effects on ocean ecosystems," Vecchi says. "The ocean currents driven by the trade winds supply vital nutrients to the near-surface ocean ecosystems across the equatorial Pacific, which is a major fishing region."

Matching theory and observations

Several theoretical studies have shown that an increase in greenhouse gases should produce a weakening of the Walker circulation. As temperatures rise and more water evaporates from the ocean, water vapor in the lower atmosphere increases rapidly. But physical processes prevent precipitation from increasing as quickly as water vapor. Since the amount of water vapor brought to the upper atmosphere must remain in balance with precipitation, the rate at which moist air is brought from the lower to the upper atmosphere slows down to compensate. This leads to a slowing of the atmospheric circulation.

Based on observations since the mid-1800s, the paper reports a 3.5% slowdown in the Walker circulation, which corresponds closely to the number predicted by theory. To establish whether human-induced climate change is at work, Vecchi and colleagues analyzed 11 simulations using the latest version of the GFDL climate model spanning the period 1861 to 2000. Some of the simulations included the observed increase in greenhouse gases; others included just the natural climate-altering factors of volcanic eruptions and solar variations. Only the simulations that included an increase in greenhouse gases showed the Walker circulation slowing, and they did so at a rate consistent with the observations.

Based on the theoretical considerations, and extrapolating from their 1861–2000 analysis as well as from other simulations for the 21st century, the authors conclude that by 2100 the Walker circulation could slow by an additional 10%. This means the steering of ocean flow by trade winds could decrease by close to 20%.

Simulation results depend on the assumptions and conditions within different models. However, the agreement of theory, observations, and models for the past 150 years lends support to this outlook, say the authors.

What about El Niño?

The study sends mixed signals on the future of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation—the system of ocean-atmosphere linkages that produces the worldwide weather of El Niño and its counterpart, La Niña.

"The circulation has been tending to a more El Niño-like state since the 1860s," says Vecchi. "However, the dynamics involved here are distinct from those of El Niño."

Wow,

I had expected that there would be several people posting that the study means nothing and proves nothing.

The world is just fine. All these alarmists need to quit doing studies to prove how FACKED the world is due to the stupidity and shortsightedness of humanity

Unfortunately when it does finally catch up to us it will be so ugly that it will take the joy out of saying I told you so.

Alan

Thanks for that, Archer.

As I live in the Pacific, it is of particular interest to me.

The world changes. Adapt or die. That is the Law.

When it catches up? I think you were asleep last august.

Yes I realize how crucial the Walker Circulation and other winds are, but you don't have to look that far to see that humans are influencing the climate of the earth. Rather than merely pointing the finger and saying how bad the problem is, we should spend more time trying to fix it. Everyone knows that humans are destroying the world, but few actually think of mehods to stop it.

I hope you're not refering to natural selection. Humans have long since "outgrown" natural selection with the use of technology. Indeed, we must "adapt" to stop the destruction of the world, but saying it and doing it are two different things. There are countless comparably insignificant things that our governments spend money on (such as the Iraq war.) In order to save the world, we must want to.

I think everyone is waiting for someone else to 'save the world'.
Excuses like "it might effect our economy."
"It might effect our standard of living."
"I like driving my big SUV around and no one is going to stop me"

They just don't get it.
There will be no economy if nothing is done.