| LoFi version for PDAs |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (3) 1 2 [3] ( Go to first unread post ) |
Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll |
| searching |
Posted: May 10 2007, 11:03 AM
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 10-May 07 Positive Feedback: 0% Feedback Score: 0 |
To further my postings I came here first looking for information on the most effective forms of freq. therapy as I am interested in procuring a unit for treatment of others. My question is not as to weather it works, as the 1934 study proved that and my personal experience strongly supports that finding.
Couple main factors go into the question I see to be most important here for the layperson lacking a P.hd background... Best method/device available to employ rife therapy? a) Gas-tube emitter or skin contact deliver of Rife therapy, which is most effective? [for the curious I believe my rife treatments were with a unit that employed a non-contact emitter of sorts I recall no hand-held conductors, also Rifes on machines employed an emitter, later in life I've read he used hand-held conductors] B) Sine or Square waves for effective treatment? [Seems sine ways hit the dial freq. but lack harmonic effect and vice versa, I understand Rife himself employed sine waves] These to questions are the focus of my researching, I have (hopefully) narrowed my search for a Rife unit down to two. One being the F-Scan 2 the later being the Phorle: Model PERL both being expensive 3k-5k and both differing in deliver system / computerized treatment settings. I tend to lean to the f-scan2 as it is much more 'turn-key' then the Phorle. IE a preprogrammed scan and treatment utility. Due to the fact new users are not allowed to post websites I included these without http/www refferance. ==== fscan.com/fscan/page/ royalrife.com/f-scan.html braintuner.com/fscan.htm resonantlight.com/store/customer/home.php ==== Just for the record I'm not in anyform making money from advertising or sale of either unit... I simply found these two to be the best of their given nature. Anybodies opinion of either units effectiveness would be appreciated and if anybody can shed light on questions A and B I'd be very happy. This post has been edited by searching on May 10 2007, 11:04 AM |
|
Send PM · Send email ·
|
| charlesclemens |
Posted: Mar 13 2008, 12:10 PM
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 13-March 08 Positive Feedback: 66.67% Feedback Score: 1 |
I firstly used Graviola extract for common cold and sneezing and flu problem but after becoming fan of Graviola’s quick and fast remedies to my problem I was eager to know more and more about Graviola than I discover that Graviola is also used on large scale for diseases like Cancer. Graviola is such a remarkable discovery to man since it is used in such a wide manner. Excellent overall except price is little bit high which should be reduced so that it would be easy to purchase Graviola for common uses too.
This post has been edited by charlesclemens on Mar 13 2008, 12:11 PM -------------------- http://allnutri.com/pid192/graviola.aspx
|
Pages:
(3) 1 2 [3] |
Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll |