| LoFi version for PDAs |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll |
| arjun_krishna |
Posted: Jan 23 2006, 07:35 PM
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 3-December 05 Positive Feedback: 0% Feedback Score: 0 |
http://www.physorg.com/news10143.html
I really like the way this site tries to make articles simpler for the masses to understand. I keep learning new things from this site. Arjun Krishna http://spaces.msn.com/members/arjunkrishna |
|
Send PM · Send email ·
|
| Crashj |
Posted: Jan 23 2006, 07:53 PM
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 14-December 05 Positive Feedback: 0% Feedback Score: 0 |
Yabbut, don't get to caught up on the fancy word they use, "decadal" which apparently means data gathered over a ten year period.
Aaaanyway, once more the scientists publish data which says we have no idea what the long term trends are for global climate variance. This will be ignored, of course, by those who believe in global warming. (snooze) |
|
Send PM · Send email ·
|
| Johnny Yuma |
Posted: Jan 24 2006, 01:56 PM
|
|
Unregistered |
Out West, in the Great Basin region, the talk is exactly opposite the tenor of this article. Yeah, we're having a warmer than average Winter, and in some places less snowfall, while in other places more snow fall. It's just the way things work. But ... seems like everyone is commenting on the same phenomenon ... "does that Sunshine feel like June to you?" Here it is January and people are asking each other if the sunlight falling on their bodies is more like what we know in June rather than January. This isn't an air temperature thing, this is a sensation of bright summer sun on our bodies, while we're in the depths of Winter. And people who live and work outside develop good sensory perception of such things. Our experience out here is 100% the opposite of this article.
|
|
|
| jayakar |
Posted: Jan 25 2006, 06:26 AM
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 79 Joined: 26-February 05 Positive Feedback: 33.33% Feedback Score: -1 |
Climate-shift & Relative potential shift of Super-cluster-matter
Though it is a good indicator to analyze the climate-shift, the reason may be: The shift in potential difference between earth and moon may be due to the relative potential shift of the Super-cluster-matter, in which earth and moon are one of the two among its constructs. |
|
Send PM · Send email ·
|
| sbruso |
Posted: Jan 26 2006, 01:54 PM
|
|
Unregistered |
This article assumes sunlight/heat as a constant. What if it is not?
|
|
|
| Eugene Gordon |
Posted: Jul 6 2006, 02:14 AM
|
|
Unregistered |
For sure the sunlight and the thermal input to the earth from high energy particles is not constant. It varies with sunspot activity. The sunspot activity follows an 11 year cycle but the peak values vary. Right now the sunspot activity is high and the thermal input is high. The temperature of the earth is tracking the sunspot activity. in considerable detail. The Maunder Minimum was a period of exceptionally low sunspot activity and caused a mini ice age several hundred years ago.
The driving force for global warming is most likely sunspot activity whereas clouds and greenhouse gas concentration modify the temperature changes that result. |
|
|
|
Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll |