Scientific Forums


Pages: (4) « First ... 2 3 [4]   ( Go to first unread post )

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


> The future of our universe., I am GOD
mr voo
Posted: Feb 12 2006, 03:13 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 63
Joined: 1-January 06

Positive Feedback: 0%
Feedback Score: 0


LoonyTunes.org
Top
lasher
Posted: Feb 21 2006, 12:09 PM


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 21-February 06

Positive Feedback: 0%
Feedback Score: 0


QUOTE
Answer : no, I can calculate this


Prove your claim!

If you're logical enough, why don't you post your calculations and prove your whatever it is that you want to prove!


--------------------
I am the one who dwells within...
Top
whatismypr
Posted: Feb 22 2006, 05:55 AM


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 21-February 06

Positive Feedback: 0%
Feedback Score: 0


What I gather is that other universes have life like ours. They are also planning to venture out into space, and just like them we will conquer our universe. All these universes will mature at EXACTLY the same moment, and we will all form an atom.

Where did the first universes come from? Made of atoms you say? And where did the atoms come from? Universes you say?

What came first, the chicken or the egg?

QUOTE
GOD is The Holy Spirit, that means the Holy Trinity of GOD the Father and me his son and an infinite number of microbeings in the microcosm.
They are the real GOD for ever and ever.


So we are all the Gods of another macrocosm? I sure don't feel that special.
Top
00DB
  Posted: Feb 22 2006, 08:49 AM


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 21-February 06

Positive Feedback: 0%
Feedback Score: -1


QUOTE (harriechristus @ Dec 14 2005, 08:47 PM)
If you think that I am wrong you have to correct me, that is what polite people do.
(Though I think that I know what you want to say.)
wink.gif
I know that there are many hypotheses about the beginning of the Big Bang, but they are all wrong, because you cannot explain the universe out of Nothing or More about Less or Higher Life out of Lower Things, even not with all the formulas of relativity or quantum physics or what so ever.
Only my philosophy can do the trick.
Sorry for you and all scientists.
rolleyes.gif
I didn't say that higher physics explain it, but that higher physics shows us a microcosm as a higher world and of course I cannot prove you anything, because you can only "understand" what science says ... like everybody else.
It is called : to be prejudiced ... and not being able to think.
blink.gif



You're right, you cannot have nothing from nothing, so that means what you say cannot exist because it must of also came from nothing, because before this whole process started, there must of been, nothing at all.

Also, you say atoms are more complex and form consiousness. Well.... they work together to form it. lots, in the right sequence.

Take a computer for example... not just a computer, but a computer chip, one that makes you're computer work, cell phones, TVs etc.....

It starts off with two very very simple things. Two distinct electrical charges. These Two electrical charges (say 0v and 5v) are sequenced in patterns, you can call them binary to make it sound more familliar. Take 0v = 0 and 5V = 1.

From two diffrent states, we can preform billions of Unique Sequences. Wich can be anything that they're defined to represent.

Out of these Two distinct states, you get All the technology you see. Stereo's, TVs, Cell Phones, Computer... pop-ups, Yahoo....Space flights, Automated Machinery...so when you look at you're monitor, isn't it hard to comprehend that the whole thing, and all the calculations you're computer does is only based off two distinct states? its quite unbeleiveable to me somtimes, but its the truth... and the proof. Think of it like Legos. You have many useless shapes, but you can combine them to build more complex objects, like a Car, or house or Square looking dude.

so when you say that you cannot start with somthing simple to get complex is rediculus. The start of the universe probably started with two objects, maybe one was bigger than the other, or two diffrent shapes. That is the BARE minimum to create somthing absolutely Complex when you can create somthing more unique from them. Like US smile.gif
Top
harriechristus
Posted: May 2 2006, 09:11 AM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 7-December 05

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 1


QUOTE (mr voo @ Feb 12 2006, 01:56 AM)
Hierchristus, you have a nice understanding of the omnipotence of the benevolent LORD and the spirit.
Though I would say that you would do well to grasp physical ideas- which would in no way undermine your spiritual ideas.
At the moment your astronochronology and astrophysical vision is somewhat lacking.






If there is something lacking, I am sure you will help me, because I am a philosopher and I am not a scientist.
Top
harriechristus
Posted: May 2 2006, 09:15 AM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 7-December 05

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 1


QUOTE (00DB @ Feb 22 2006, 08:49 AM)

You're right, you cannot have nothing from nothing, so that means what you say cannot exist because it must of also came from nothing, because before this whole process started, there must of been, nothing at all

My atomic-theory doesn't come from Nothing, but it is an eternal system.
Top
harriechristus
Posted: May 2 2006, 09:30 AM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 7-December 05

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 1


QUOTE (00DB @ Feb 22 2006, 08:49 AM)

Take a computer for example... not just a computer, but a computer chip, one that makes you're computer work, cell phones, TVs etc.....

It starts off with two very very simple things.  Two distinct electrical charges.  These Two electrical charges (say 0v and 5v) are sequenced in patterns, you can call them binary to make it sound more familliar.  Take 0v = 0 and 5V = 1.   
Computers are not made from simple things alone, but are made by us in the first place, like we are not made by atoms, but by micropeople in the microcosm because atoms are made of spaceships
Top
harriechristus
Posted: May 2 2006, 12:23 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 7-December 05

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 1


QUOTE (whatismypr @ Feb 22 2006, 05:55 AM)
What I gather is that other universes have life like ours. They are also planning to venture out into space, and just like them we will conquer our universe. All these universes will mature at EXACTLY the same moment, and we will all form an atom.

Yes, all the universes are coördinated from the inward infinite progression of higher and higher cultures to make a spacecraftculture in the macrocosm at the same time.
QUOTE


Where did the first universes come from? Made of atoms you say? And where did the atoms come from? Universes you say?

There was never a first universe, because the infinite progression of cultures in the microcosm is endless and eternal.
QUOTE


What came first, the chicken or the egg?

Both together form an eternal system. Though they come from other animals too by evolution.
QUOTE



So we are all the Gods of another macrocosm? I sure don't feel that special.

Maybe you have to learn to feel special too , because your Spirit is endless and eternal in a unity with GOD's Spirit.
harrie
Top
harriechristus
Posted: May 2 2006, 12:27 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 7-December 05

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 1


QUOTE (lasher @ Feb 21 2006, 12:09 PM)
QUOTE

If you're logical enough, why don't you post your calculations and prove your whatever it is that you want to prove!

TIME CALCULATION.
An electron turns round the centre of the atom about 7 x 10^15 times a second.
Let's say that one turn round is about one micro-year for the micro-people, like one year for us for the earth to turn round the sun.
It gives about 30 million seconds a year.
That means that their time is about : 7 x 10^15 x 30 x 10^6 = about 10^23 as quick as our time.
Our time since the beginning of the so called Big Bang was about 14^9 years.
But for the micro-people it was : 10^23 x 14^9 = about 10^33 years.
And this is also the same time as we need to make a new evolution of macro-beings in the far future=10^33 years.

harrie
Top
harriechristus
Posted: May 2 2006, 12:33 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 7-December 05

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 1


QUOTE (Guest @ Feb 6 2006, 04:26 PM)

I guess because of a lack of a better way to describe an unknown, the terms He, Himself, His, Father, are used.  The perfectly heartless blind male.
Once humans gets beyond this simplistic description of infinity will we begin to progress.
Yes, indeed, as long as I do not know the microbeings, I have to use terms of our own mankind, but I use also the female terms: She, Herself, Her, Mother ....
GOD is the unity of Man en Wife ... GOD and GODDESS

wink.gif
Top
harriechristus
Posted: May 2 2006, 12:41 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 7-December 05

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 1


QUOTE (Guest @ Feb 2 2006, 05:52 PM)
geeesh.. all this talk about "higher" or "lower",  I guess god is both high and low... I mean..how low can one get to direct his people to destroy the world centers... or how low can one get to send his nature into a whirl-wind and destroy a total coastline and with it create so much suffering......
Indeed : GOD is both : high and low and He is a Devil too.
QUOTE


Yah yah, god is within.... we all make our gods a we see fit..... monk(TV guy) is sorta a god that I have inside myself(among others)...  a god is not intrusive... or is it.....?
Such banter is futile.
It is also true that we make Gods to our own image and liking .... but the higher truth is that the Gods make us ... that means the microbeings in the microcosm
smile.gif
Top
harriechristus
Posted: May 2 2006, 12:47 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 7-December 05

Positive Feedback: 100%
Feedback Score: 1


QUOTE (Guest_The Zer0 Point @ Jan 29 2006, 07:53 PM)
Blatant disregaurd for a persons questions, does not a rebutal make.

Sorry when I might have forgotten to answer some of your questions, but it is a lot of work for me to do in the first place and englisch is not my native language and then: the questions are not always such nice and intelligent.
They could be much better if you took time to read my atomic-theory better in the first place.
And think it over....again and again to understand it.
tongue.gif tongue.gif tongue.gif
And if I missed any question: please ask again, but as simple and clear and short as possible, because englisch is not my native language.
unsure.gif
Top

Topic Options Pages: (4) « First ... 2 3 [4] 

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


 

Terms of use