Fast Galaxy Formation, The early universe

The following link, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/28/weird_big_galaxy/ describes a discovery of large galaxies that formed about 800M years from the beginnnig of the universe. This discovery implies that in less than a billions years from time=0, there was already a large galaxy in the universe cranking out stars. It took six times longer for our sun to form than a whole galaxy.

Think what needs to happen for that galaxy to form in 800M years from t=0. It can not be due to gravity pulling into a small discontinuities predicted by existing theory. The discontinuities need to be very large, way beyond anything predicted by exisiting theory.

The question is how can a discontinuous expansion with large chunks be possible? The answer is an entropy expansion. If the primordial atom split into two at a distance D it would define less entropy than a continuum spherical shell a diameter D. They both define the same mass times distance, but the two point split would define less entropy. The shell has more disorder or more entropy by virtue of being more points. This implies that a two point split expansion a distance D, will have more free energy left over compared to the continuum shell. This means more free energy for other things like quickly making galaxies.

The next question becomes why an entropy expansion and not a traditional force expansion? Here is the theory.

Consider a hypothetical contracting closed universe near the end of its life cycle. As the material and space within our hypothetical closed terminal universe gets denser and closer, all the particles within the universe will become increasingly elementary in nature and will increasingly shift toward the highest energy elementary particle states. In the limit, these highest energy elementary particles will begin to overlap to form something analogous to the primordial atom. If we take this primal overlap to the extreme, the distance variable will disappear between all these extreme particles, as they all overlap at their geometric centers to form a primal point.

When the distance variable equals zero everywhere in the universe, a force discontinuity will be created. This force discontinuity is a paradoxical state. On the one hand, the force discontinuity implies something like infinite force is still exerting itself on a finite amount of mass/energy (black hole?). On the other hand, the force discontinuity also implies something like force disappearing from the universe. This paradoxical state is indicative of the alpha state of a new universe cycle implicit of t=0.

There is a simple and logical way for the universe to expand while also simultaneously fulfilling both of the paradoxical potentials implicit of the state of the universe when d=0 and t=0. Both paradoxical potentials can be fulfilled, simultaneously, if time remains stuck at zero, while only the distance variable increases away from zero. On the one hand, force requires time to act such that without time force doesn’t yet exist. On the other hand, any finite distance expansion away from d=0, in zero time, is analogous to acceleration as though infinite force is acting.

The result is a quantum mass extropy expansion in distance without time. The force paradox is expressed by an entropy expansion, i.e,, acts like infinite force without force needin to be present, that will create large maybe quantum discontinuities. When t finally increases from zero, the force paradox and the pure entropy expansion is nullified. The chunks begin to continuum expand by be influenced by force.

By the Aether theory all the so called "visible mass" (formed by the quantum loops of vacuum of dimension convolution level N > 6) is overcooled and behaves as metastable with contact of vacuum (N = 5.9X), evaporating to the radiation (i.e. photons). This process speed is the more higher, as the more closer the energy density is to the equilibrium GUT energy density (i.e. at the higher temperatures/energy density).



All the particles are the result as the shock wave effect during the initial collapse of universe as the result of so called inflation process (which was gravity forced deflation, in fact). The visible mass has appeared on the places, where the forefronts of the collapsing vacuum have met together and mutually collided with each other. Most of these places are still observable as the fine reams of the so called dark matter across space (areas of higher vacuum fluctuation density). In the center of these streaks the initial nuclei of galaxies (so called quasars) has appeared. As the vacuum cooled down, the most of quasar mass was spreads and evaporated by its radiation pressure, forming the center of massive galaxies. It means, all visible matter is just a very low yield (< 1E-40) byproduct of the vacuum formation during inflation, but the process of its formation is understandable and quite conventional, based on the suggestion, the vacuum behaves like a common massive substance.

This analysis makes sense if one assumes a vacuum rebound expansion, which is not too far from what I suggested as an entropy expansion. The problem is, what about the black hole or near black hole conditions from which is needs to expand from? Should this not create only infinite or near infinite wavelength energy? How does this energy go from infinite wavelength back to very small energetic wavelength? A collision buildup might take too long to explain the rapid formation of galaxies.

Here is how. If we look at energy, for example light, it travels at the speed of light, but nevertheless defines inertial reference with respect to distance and time or wavelength and frequency. In other words, if we traveled at C, distance should be totally contracted and time totally dilated, yet with light its expression of distance and time remain with an inertial artifact of reference. The red shift of distant galaxies, does not affect the speed of light, but it does affect the distance and time of the light due to the relativistic velocity of the galaxies. If the speed of light is constant in all reference and distance and time of light was at the speed of light, these should also remain constant, but they don't, because they are not traveling at the speed of light. They are defining inertial reference. The light we see is what allows up to see inertial.

These observations imply that light has one component moving at the speed of light and two inertial components, distance and time. The equivalence of matter and energy and their ability to change back and forth suggests that the speed of light component of light is connected to massless particles or something massless. If these massless particles gain any mass they will need to decrease from the speed of light. The use of one common particle that can exist with or without mass is the easiest way to explain the equivalence of matter and energy. One can get more complicated if they wish.

Putting aside the single mass-massless particle, if light was totally traveling at the speed of light, i.e, also with respect to its distance and time reference, its wavelength or its distance reference would need to be infinite or include the universe. And its time reference would need to be totally time dilated (frequency is zero in inertial reference). This is what stems from the event horizon of the black hole.

The formation of large galaxies so quickly within the earliest universe can most readily be explained from large scale discontinuities that are inherent within the earliest expansion. Their formation from only small scale discontinuities require gravity conditions that get sci-fi in magnitude to be able to explain such rapid galaxy formation. What this suggests is a different ordering of the three parameters of total (mass, distance and time) speed of light energy reference coming back into inertial reference. For example if the M component drops from C it would create the primordial atom in the black hole reference of distance and time, i.e, eternal state where the whole universe is distance contracted into a point. The potential energy within the C reference of the massless particle adds mass to the finite amount of massless particles as they enter inertial or finite reference. This creates the potential energy blob called inertial matter.

Next let us have the distance component drop from the reference of C. This makes the universe finite in size. This causes our point mass to appear to expand. This change of distance reference potential energy is the entropy expansion with time=0. Time is not technically stuck at zero, but rather it is still within an eternal or speed of light reference. This entropy expansion has all the time in the universe, i.e., eternity, to spread out.

Quantum/discontinuous entropy expansion is the most effecting way to use up the potential energy stemming from D dropping from C. Finally time reference drops from C. This results in time, energy and force within the universe due to the common massless particle of mass/energy equivalence. The result are billions of mini big bangs (MBB). The pressure waves stemming from this array of separated MBB expansions makes the universe expand uniformly in all directions, which is observed. The pressure waves from all the MBB also help contain each little expansion center, while creating turbulence, allowing galaxies and maybe stars to form quite rapidly.

The biggest problem with this theory is that it is too simple. Everyone prefers the expansion/evolution of the universe to be more complicated. The power of this theory is that it is very flexible. If we start with M first coming from C and then time and finally distance, we get the traditional BB. In other words, we get mass then time, or a very hot mass with the clock ticking, gravity. Then we add distance from C, we get the traditional BB expansion.

If we start with distance then time or time then distance we get energy first; massless state with finite distance and time reference appearing within the universe. Then we add M last, the universe will phase change into matter particles for a subsequent evolution of the universe,

These three orderings are all valid scenarios for creating the universe. With a cyclic universe they may all takes turns. But within this particular universe cycle at least, galaxies formed very fast; Mass, then distance then time from C reference offers the easiest path.

What is also very slick is that all three scenarios stem from a speed of light reference, meaning this this aspect of the universe was and is always there. This also accommodates those who believe that the universe was always here. Everybody is right!