Life First Started On Planet Mercury?, Looking for biological evidence support

In the article it doesn't show what sort of statistics have been applied to the data. So it is still possible it was said loosely as insignificant rather than mathematically insignificant.

See you have used the significant word again! Is it cooling or heating? But I was told it is cooling by around 100 degrees every billion years, so it is cooling and therefore I suspect it to be contracting.

Aren't you contradicting yourself/ Yesterday you were telling us the Earth was once completely molten, but now you'd have to go down quite a long way to get to molten material. So that too sounds like cooling has set in under your scenario. But mind you I see the whole situation differently.

Go screw yourself with a fork and knife

"Testing you" would be futile. You fail every time.

And yes, I don't believe contraction due to cooling of either Mercury or Mars has ever taken place, and you are simply spewing out your anus.

Truthfully, I don't believe there is any merit in anything you've posted since you first appeared.

Amen.

Well I'm sure I've seen a recent photo showing signs of contraction on Mars. How do you find a photo?


http://www.space.com/418-marsquakes-red-planet-rumble.html

On the Moon there is evidence for contraction:

"New Images Show Recent Geologic Activity on the Moon"
http://airandspace.si.edu/events/pressroom...m?releaseID=278

"Chapter 7
Earth and the Terrestrial Worlds"

This post has been edited by Robittybob1 on May 24 2012, 12:14 AM

Have you seen any work you have done publicized?

It seems you are not convincing anyone here. I can't even tell if you've convinced yourself since the work your are at is being postponed indefinitely. If you came here only to entertain opposition to your idea without even being sure of it yourself, you've achieved nothing but self reproach in the long run if you're lucky. Neurosis and discontent if not.

This thread is the research behind the idea that life first started on Mercury. I was hoping to find some residual biological evidence for it. I would say only Soundhertz comes close to being interested in biology, as the forum seems to be hung up on discussions on time and relativity.

BruceP was the first to challenge me to write it up as a paper when he said "put your money where your mouth is", or something like that.

I don't really need to convince anyone here. As long as they continually pick out the weak spots and I can find answers for them I feel as if the idea is becoming more entrenched in my head. I believe it as it fits the evidence better than the current knowledge. So there will be a shift toward my view over time. This will happen whether I write it up or not. It is inevitable.

This post has been edited by Robittybob1 on May 24 2012, 03:17 AM

Mentally incontinent.

@Alex - Go back a few posts and there you are saying you didn't know about the contraction of the planets and moons due to cooling. I found the evidence without much difficulty or dispute that Mercury, Mars and the Moon have shrunk, so I ask why hasn't the Earth?
You have shown your ignorance and that you are a hopeless case for you haven't got the courtesy to discuss what I had found for you.

This post has been edited by Robittybob1 on May 24 2012, 07:44 AM

Then intentionally write a Sci-Fi book.

Do you think you could do it? It sounds rather a drastic step, to go from a simple idea to a sci-fi book. I'm not up to it.

Well, it's up to you what you do. Either sublimate your imagination or don't.

I think I've said all that I really want at this point.

It's tragic that you think writing a book of fiction is harder than coming up with a comprehensive theory on solar system formation.

This thread is the book in itself the hero The Mad professor Robittybob1 fighting off the wicked AlexG Force. His half hearted assistants Beer w/straw and flyingbuttressman caught in between.
The Devils Granouille and Lady Elizabeth sidelined he struggles on to get readership and acceptance for his comprehensive theory on solar system formation.

[PS 300 views on a quite day - not to bad]

This post has been edited by Robittybob1 on May 24 2012, 07:42 PM

You have found no evidence of anything. You have found speculation based on geological features, features which indicate geologic activity. And you totally ignore anything in these press releases which might contradict you.

As I said, mentally incontinent.

@beer w/straw I looked up the phrase

in Google and it hasn't appear before.
Looking at the meaning of sublimate there was it's use in psychology meaning

So you are saying turn this activity into something socially acceptable.