Scientific Forums


Pages: (2) 1 [2]   ( Go to first unread post )

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


> The Physical Education.
s0cratus
Posted: Apr 4 2009, 11:35 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


Basic physics without words.
==========================

http://www.av8n.com/physics/basic_physics.html

=========================


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Apr 8 2009, 09:00 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


What does ‘ Yahoo’ mean ?
============ ===.
Gulliver’s Travels.
Part:
Gulliver in the land of the Houyhnhnms.
/ Jonathan Swift./

One of the words that the two horses said several
times sounded like ‘Yahoo ‘ . ……….
I could not understand its meaning. ………
Then I understood.
‘ Yahoo’ was the beastly creature just like a man…….
The Yahoo’s hands, feet were like mine, …….
The Yahoo’s face was like mine, but ………..
but . . . .Yahoo could not be taught ………………
============ ====..
It seems that the creators of http://www.yahoo. com/
were great jokers or maybe they knew how hard
the people be taught.
============ ======..
P.S.
Is the word ‘Yahoo’ similar to word ‘Google’ ?


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Apr 12 2009, 04:18 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


What did Planck do?
Planck studied a ‘ black body’ and saw.
If Michelson/ Morley quantum of light, which moves
with constant speed c=1, fells into ‘ black body’ and
doesn’t come back when the radiations/ thermodynamics’
death of Universe must come.
Therefore, in order to save the Universe from death,
Planck decided that the Michelson/ Morley quantum
of light must radiate from ‘ the black body’ by quantum of
light. This quantum of light is an energy quanta.
Why?
Because the quantum of light come from ‘ black body’.
Max Laue called it as ‘ The Kirchhoff 's vacuum’.
On my opinion the thermal equilibrium of ‘ black body’,
‘ The Kirchhoff 's vacuum’ is a real model of Vacuum: T=0K.
And Vacuum itself, as QT says, is the Homogeneous Space
of the lowest ( the background ) level of Energy.
Therefore, quantum of light must be an energy quanta.
#
Our education.
I n the school’s books is written that black coal or soot
is good example of a ‘black body’. But astrophysicists
use the laws of ‘black body’ to understand the Universe.
And the Universe doesn’t covered with black coal or soot.
Our Universe as whole is Vacuum.
================== . .
P.S.
In physics, a black body is an idealized object that absorbs all
electromagnetic radiation that falls on it. No electromagnetic
radiation passes through it and none is reflected. Because no light
(visible electromagnetic radiation) is reflected or transmitted,
the object appears black when it is cold. However, a black body
emits a temperature-dependent spectrum of light. This thermal radiation
from a black body is termed black-body radiation
#
In astronomy, objects such as stars are frequently regarded as
Black bodies, though this is often a poor approximation.
An almost perfect black-body spectrum is exhibited by the
cosmic microwave background radiation. Hawking radiation
is the hypothetical black-body radiation emitted by black holes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_radiation


================= . .


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Apr 30 2009, 08:54 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


If there’s nothing wrong with me,
maybe there’s something wrong with the Universe.
/ One physicist ./
=========================


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jun 28 2009, 04:21 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


Saturday, June 27, 2009 .

Lecture: Neutrino Lesson for Dissidents.
/ by David de Hilster /

http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/events/FriendlyLetter.pdf
/ World Science Database. /
================================= .

My opinion.
1.
Trying to save ‘ The law of conservation and transformation energy ‘
Wolfgang Pauli discover ( theorized) neutrino ‘on the end of his pen.’
2.
According to QED Electron has infinity energy in interaction
with vacuum: E= ∞.
But according to ‘ The law of conservation
and transformation energy ‘ it is impossible.
3.
So. How to understand this situation?
What does ’ The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass’
mean according to one single electron or photon or neutrino ?
======= .
P.S.
#
Robert Milliken in his Nobel speech ( 1923) told, that he knew
nothing about the ‘last essence of electron ‘.
#
You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.
/ Albert Einstein./
#
Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
/ From an article./
#
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, ' What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, *** and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken.
( Albert Einstein, 1954)

The same Einstein’s words is possible to say about electron.
#
More than ten different models of the electron are presented here. (!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.

/ book ‘ What is the Electron? ‘
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /
http://redshift.vif.com/BookBlurbs/Electron.htm

And it is possible to find 100 more models of electron in the internet.
============== .
So. My conclusion.
1.
The neutrino problem was raised from the wish to keep (preserve !)
‘ The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass’.
2.
We don’t know what electron and photon are and therefore
we don’t know what neutrino is.
3.
In my opinion the discussion about neutrino, photon, electron
and others micro particles must be connected with
‘ The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass’.
Without this connection every dispute is tautology.
====== .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.

http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab...Display&id=1372
===================== . .


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jul 1 2009, 10:54 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


The mixed Electron from Wikipedia .

Electron.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron

a)
The electron is a subatomic particle that . . . . . .
is believed to be a point particle . . (!!! ??? )
and belong to the first-generation of fundamental particles
b)
The classical electron radius is 2.8179 × 10 - 15 m . (!!!)
c)
The electron has no known substructure. (!!! )
d)
electrons can act as waves.
This is called the wave–particle duality (!!!)
e)
An isolated electron that is not undergoing acceleration is unable
to emit or absorb a real photon ( !!! ) ; doing so would violate
conservation of energy and momentum . ( !!!)
==== .
My conclusion:
#
Electron is the point particle with the
classical electron radius 2.8179 × 10 - 15 m,
( the radius shows that electron must have a form .)
which has no known substructure but can emit or absorb a real
photon ( where does electron hide the real photon? In its pocket ?),
and electron can be a corpuscular and can be a wave,
and belong to the first-generation of fundamental particles.
#
And according to SRT the point particle or classical electron radius
cannot all time keep firm form, the electron’s form must be elastic
. . . .variable.
#
When electrons and positrons collide, they annihilate each other . .
(!!! ???)
And when electron interact with vacuum its parameters became infinity .
(!!! What does it mean ??? )
The experimental lower bound for the electron's mean lifetime
is 4.6 × 10^ 26 years, . . . .
! !!
And trying to understand the birth of an electron
we search for his mother a ‘ Higgs boson ‘.
======= .
We have two possibilities:
To believe that electron looks like the Wikipedia says
or, maybe, to understand and agree that our intellect
looks a little strange.
====== . .
My opinion about
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron
#
Half truth can be falsehood.
Half answer can be not truthful answer.
========== .
S.


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jul 3 2009, 03:13 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


Interesting opinion about electron.

Socratus.
Yes, this response makes sense on me.
Now I can understand more clear, what physicists
don't understand that they say about Physics / Electron.

Andy.
What is it that we don't understand about what we say?
Except, when we say we don't understand something completely?
Do you mean that YOU don't understand what we are saying?

For example, when I say that an electron is an electron –
I guess you think that I don't understand anything about an electron?

Imagine for a moment, that we find some furry little animal on Mars.
We might try to tell other earthlings what it 'is'.
We might say, well, it is sort of a cat, but also like a fox. But it isn't a cat,
it isn't a fox, it isn't anything we have on earth. It comes from Mars,
and is completely different from anything on earth. It is a furry little
animal from Mars. In all honesty, that is all we can say about it.
To say it has some characteristics of a cat, and some characteristics of a fox,
might convey some insight to other earthlings, but it is neither a cat nor a fox.

Would that mean that biologists don't understand anything they say
about biology? I don't think so.

Likewise, we can discuss the properties of an electron - it has a mass,
a charge, a magnetic moment, an angular momentum. But what it really IS,
I don't think we understand. We know some things about it, but not everything.
That doesn't mean we know everything, or even pretend to - I've NEVER heard
a physicist say he thinks we know everything; have you?
Nor does it mean we know nothing.

I await your answers to my questions.

Andy

Northern Arizona University
Physics-Astronomy Dept
United States
============ === .

Interesting opinion about electron, isn’t it?
Our Electron as an animal from Mars. (!!!)

Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.



--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jul 5 2009, 05:31 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


This is only my idea about electron.

By this, I mean that I don't speak for ALL physicists;
that would certainly be presumptuous.
We have a Quantum Theorist in our department; I chatted
with him a bit - told him, my view is that an electron is like a box,
that you are told you can NEVER open, NEVER know what is inside.
But, coming through holes in the box, we sometimes see a tail wagging,
and sometimes a paw slapping around.
We can NEVER know there is a cat inside (I told you that, above).
So, we say sometimes there are paws in the box
(and sticking out), sometimes tails.
ANALOGY: electron, sometimes wave, sometimes particle.

He just shook his head and walked away. So, go figure.

Andy.


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jul 8 2009, 02:56 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


How do you see the unity of all Physical Laws ?

I ask this question because between Real Laws
( Newton’s , Maxwell’s, Einstein's, Lorentz’s,
Schrödinger’s, Dirac’s . . . .etc.) there are many ‘ black holes’
and ‘ white spots’ ( time, dark energy, dark mass, graviton,
quark, Higgs boson, . . . and 1000 another elementary particles.)

Comments.
1.
Unity? That's news :) But physics keeps striving to reduce the number
of equations necessary to describe everything -- so called unification.

It began when Newton unified gravity on earth with gravity in space.
1 equation.

Unification continued when Maxwell reduced all the experiments
on electricity and magnetism to just 4 equations.

It continued with Einstein's special relativity, which amounts
to the Lorentz transformation. 4 equations. You might say
it unifies space and time. General relativity unifies gravitational
mass with inertial mass.

Then equations of motion for atoms were described by quantum
mechanics -- such as Schroedinger Equation & later Dirac Equation.
These form the common unification of chemistry.

Then quantum electrodynamics was discovered, which unified
electromagnetism with the quantum theory. Some of theory's
predictions (such as the fine structure constant) have been
experimentally verified to something like 10 or 12 decimal places,
a huge measure of success for any physical theory.

Meanwhile the strong & weak nuclear forces were partly
de-mystified: The weak force was found to be unified with
electromagnetism (electro-weak force), while the strong nuclear
force involves quarks of various kinds, with specific rules of
interaction best described by group theory.

And so it goes. The 'holy grail' of physics is to reduce all
of existence (all interactions of all particles) into a single equation,
sometimes called "God's Equation" -- the ultimate unification.

" Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler."
/ --Albert Einstein /
/ by xprofessor /
2.
i think there is unity in most laws but not all, after quantum physics
basically there is no real law, we think of time, gravity and matter
in certain ways but in reality they are random forces with mostly
predictable outcomes but not 100 %, then there is parallel
universes and things as such where physical laws go the
wayside , just like black holes. , so in reality , not much unity.
/ by newyorkguy /

3.
Their is the laws of the microverse and laws for the macroverse
(verse = universe) I wonder if they apply 100% at their own
extents and reduce (perhaps exponentially) as they come closer
toward the other one meshing in the in the middle. thus the
macrocosm still deals with quantum physics at say .00000000000000000000000000000 1% near the size of say
our solar system where "normal" laws of say gravity
exist at 99.9999999999999999999999999% and vice versa
at say the size of an atom it is the other way...?????
?? hhmmmmmmmm???? just perhaps.
/ by guardian /
4.
I want it to be simple and not too magical.
/ by SuperA /
5.
Yours is a very profound question. I can tell from your question that
you are ready to be let in on the "Dirty Little Secret" of Theoretical Physics:
We have NOT yet figured everything out. The universe is governed by whole
sets of "Laws" that do NOT agree and are mutually exclusive.
This is a great embarrassment. We assume we live in an orderly, rational
universe that makes sense. Perhaps when Quantum Mechanics and
General Relativity are unified we will have a better answer to your question.

A paraphrase from NOVA - Elegant Universe with Graham Greene
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/pro…
/ by OldPilot /
================ . .
P.S.
I think that now our Physics looks like the Augean stables.

And if we want to clean them we must start from
understanding not new but the old abstract models:
ideal gas, ideal black body, entropy, electrical harmonic
oscillators, point -particle . . . etc.
====== . .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.



--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jul 9 2009, 05:56 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


Comments.
1.
The LAWS must unify, or we are describing things that don't actually exist.
/ Allen Francom /.
2.
Aether is unity. The design of the universe is one.
/ Mitch Raemsch /
======== .


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jul 9 2009, 12:32 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


Comments.
#
Something to do with the process of potential, I'd say.
/ ZerkonXXXX /
==== .
Hi, ZerkonXXXX.
Would you agree if I say :
1.
What in Vacuum is hidden 99% of unseen
potential antimatter/ antienergy ( dark matter/energy).
2.
We can see result of these potential antimatter/ antienergy
as 1% of visible matter and energy in the World.
Socratus.

# #
The unity of physical laws is the "Capernaum" conservation
of energy in stasis.
Capernaum:
Rendered in Greek as "Kαφαρναουμ (Kapharnaum)".
In Arabic, it is called Talhum, and it is assumed that this refers
to the ruin (Tell) of Hum.
/ Musatov. /
=============== .
Hi, Musatov.

I think your answer isn’t complete.
The complete name of the physical law is:
" The Law of Conservation and Transformation
of Energy/ Mass".
So, you need to finish your comment.
Socratus.
========= .
# # #
Aether is unity. The design of the universe is one.
/ Mitch Raemsch /
#
Question.
Is it possible to write/ describe Aether
by the formula: T=0K or No ?
Socratus.
====================










--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jul 10 2009, 05:00 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


How do you see the unity of all Physical Laws ?
#
By wearing special Unity glasses !
/ Don Stockbauer /
===================== .
Do we see the Universe using only Math glasses ?
Socratus.



--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jul 11 2009, 07:42 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


Reflections on a Self-Representing Universe
By CambridgeBlog ⋅
/ By Shahn Majid. /

#
Space and Time debate needs to involve not only scientists
but the wider public.

. . . in fact, theoretical physics is in need of fresh profound ideas

The reason is that scientists’ ideas have to come from somewhere,
from sitting around in cafes, from contemplation of art.

We don’t know where the key revolutionary idea
is going to come from.

Put another way, to progress, scientists need now to see
what Science is, which means they have to step outside it
and see it in part as a non-scientist.

#
I want you to ask yourself what does someone have
to say about quantum gravity?
What does that person have in common with a theoretical physicist?
My approach as a theoretical physicist is to use
mathematics and the scientific method to explore the issue,
while a carol singer is surely using other means to ‘connect’.

As a scientist I am 1000% committed to the Scientific Method
but I see it as a particular way of exploring reality.

One that we might now need to understand better by seeing
it from the outside.

What I am going to argue now is that what we know about
quantum gravity — what we have seen in earlier posts — is telling
us that the Scientific Method itself is perhaps the fundamental
‘metaequation’ of physics.

In other words, just maybe, as we search for the ultimate theory
of physics we are in fact rediscovering our own assumptions
in being Scientists, the Scientific Method?
#
http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2008/12/refle...nting-universe/

================ .


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jul 12 2009, 03:55 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


Quote 1.
Hence, to summarise - it seems that mathematics has always
Provided a stable, natural (?) language in which to describe
phenomena but it may not be the ultimate 'natural' language
of the universe!

Einstein sought to understand ‘his [God's] equations’ but perhaps
the 'universe' has been having a 'bit of a laugh' at our feeble
efforts to describe it using mathematics!

Perhaps the universal 'picture' will be clearer when we understand
the universes’ own hidden language?

/ Conclusion from a long math comment.
Author is unknown. /

Quote 2. JerryGG:

I run into similar problems when I attempt to understand why
positive dot-waves attract negative dot-waves and visa versa
at a distance.
Yet close up positive dot-waves merge into positive dot-waves.

Whether my theory is true of not, we are faced with a problem
that the universe operates on certain basic rules which are not
easily understood. Then science degenerates into philosophy or
meta-physics at the basic level. All we are left with is intuitive
solutions.

All our experiments are limited to interactions with electrons
as the measuring probes. This is the limit of our experiments.
Thus we cannot readily see beyond our measuring instruments.

3.
All our experiments are limited to interactions with electrons
as the measuring probes. This is the limit of our experiments.
Thus we cannot readily see beyond our measuring instruments.
/ JerryGG: / jerrygg38 /
======== .

Quote 3.
So.
1.
The problem of understanding the microworld ( electron)
existing is connected with the measuring.
2.
The measurement is connected with the measuring instruments.
3.
The region of using measuring instruments is limited.
4.
Does this limiting mean the end of our knowledge ?
5.
Or, maybe, is it possible to understand the microworld
somehow in another way?
====== .
Do we have 'Theory of Knowledge' ?
Of course. Maybe 1000.
====== . .
Socratus.


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top
s0cratus
Posted: Jul 12 2009, 12:11 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 538
Joined: 7-August 05

Positive Feedback: 36.36%
Feedback Score: -44


Comment.

It seems there are very real limitations to seeing the universe
with our extended senses. Sense data is perhaps nearing the
boundary imposed by time and distance, our observable
universe but a tiny part of a much greater whole.
Finite mind trying to understand infinite reality using
abstract tools of doubtful logic is perhaps a non-starter.
At least our minds are capable of reasoning how the
universe might be, and perhaps even our wildest imagination
will never do justice to how it really is.
If we could see it for real, it would lose the magic
of its eternal mystery.
/ A P /
============ .


--------------------
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
Top

Topic Options Pages: (2) 1 [2] 

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


 

Terms of use