Scientific Forums


Pages: (2) [1] 2   ( Go to first unread post )

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


> Speed Of Moving In Space Transformed In Speed Of
dimazin
Posted: Jul 16 2008, 02:54 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


I was right, but my theory was wrong. Because there was no impulse (or energy) for speed of moving into the future, and true speed was very improbable.
v-true speed
V=v*1/(1-v^2/c^2)^1/2 -Prospective speed of moving in space

V-v=Transformed speed of moving in space into speed of moving into the future
Top
dimazin
Posted: Jul 18 2008, 08:29 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


Unit of measure of speed of movement into the future is 1 s'/s
s - usual second
s' - second of travel into the future


m * 1 s'/s =m * 3*10^8 m/s

momentum.
Top
dimazin
Posted: Jul 18 2008, 02:45 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


(T*1/(1-v^2/c^2)^1/2 - T)*v/cT = speed of moving into the future s'/s


Forgive, TheDoc. I am wrong again?
Top
dimazin
Posted: Jul 21 2008, 03:19 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


Excuse me,

(T*1/(1-v^2/c^2)^1/2 - T)/T - speed of moving into the future s'/s .

Would you like to tell to me? What takes additional energy in the relativity : mass increasing or kinematic dilation of time?
Top
midwestern
Posted: Jul 21 2008, 06:35 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Guests
Posts: 463
Joined: 5-February 05

Positive Feedback: 26.32%
Feedback Score: -23


Stop asking the Doc and get it right. mad.gif
Top
dimazin
Posted: Jul 24 2008, 05:12 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


Well that in the theoretical physics there are no incorrigible mistakes.
Top
dimazin
Posted: Aug 6 2008, 02:28 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


The first seconds of speed of moving into the future take less impulse (or energy), and last meters of speed of moving in space take more energy, therefore there is a transition from speed of moving in space to speed of movement into the future.
Top
dimazin
Posted: Sep 13 2008, 03:49 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


E=hv
E - energy
v - frequency of fluctuation of a wave

In glass or in water this formula is wrong.


My formula is right always!

v=E"/E'

E" - energy of moving into the future
E' - energy of travel in space

Top
dimazin
Posted: Sep 13 2008, 12:34 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


The mass of a photon approximately equal 1,4745*10^-50 kilogram


This piece of mass never turns into energy and is residual mass.
Top
billyandtherockets
Posted: Sep 14 2008, 09:25 AM


Member
**

Group: Power Member
Posts: 135
Joined: 21-August 07

Positive Feedback: 8.33%
Feedback Score: -45


Gentlemen: I wish to point out there is no FUTURE or PAST only NOW in every point of the universe. Time is a man made measurement, nothing more,. based on the rotation of this Earth. (which would be different on other planets). Therefore calculations that plug in TIME as an actual force are all wrong. The sooner this is realized, the sooner we will advance. Recently it was disclosed that SPIN increases the energy level of chemicals
(including those that comprise atomic clocks --and another PhD showed us that light can be accelerated 30 times faster when fired thru a chamber of cesium. (to the speed where the light almost exited the chamber prior to firing the laser). So now we have new set of problems
1-time does not exist
2- spin increases energy levels by at least 33% and
3-the constant is no longer the constant when cesium is involved.

These seem like clues to me...and it might take me another 6 months to make sense of it.


what would happen to the light if the cesium is in a rotating chamber when the laser is fired? The spin would increase the energy state of the cesium (i suppose depending on the speed of rotation) and perhaps there is some use for that.
I am wondering who can write the calculations for the above. If any institution performs this experiment I would like to receive a report.

Perhaps if the rotation of the chamber can be varied as the laser is fired through the chamber we might get interesting results. a pulsing, or frequencies that perhaps can be modulated with intelligence, which would greatly increase the speed of communications. I propose a satellite as a relay or reflector. It will be interesting to see what is the upper end limit of the speed of the laser light as the rotation of the chamber is increased...could it actually exit the chamber an instant before the lase was fired? (I doubt it.....but the measured time would be too small to measure)
instantaneous (depending on the distance) which lends the idea we can now reach the ends of the universe with intelligent signals almost as fast as the speed of gravity.
Any one out there interested in experimenting? Where is the cesium store? haha

Anyone have a strong glass sphere? (that can be rotated to high speeds).
Also the velocity of the laser light is unknown after it departs the chamber and for what distance. I envision a series of rotating glass spheres filled with cesium to act as amplifiers..the distance apart would make a good experiment also.
Perhaps these spheres can be placed in orbit to form a chain around the earth and the same beam can be returned to the original sphere only to be sent out again to the point where the original BEAM would be traveling at fantastic high velocities.
(CERN IN SPACE WITH PHOTONS). (providing the light can be made to curve a bit to the next sphere) Perhaps this would form enough artificial light to end night, or even light up some other planet (i am brainstorming as I write).
Perhaps some form of this is what Barred universes employ to form a light bridge spanning the center black hole at speeds which the black hole cant grab.
THERE IS LOT TO EXPERIMENT WITH NOW thanks to von braun and the PhD who fired that first beam thru cesium. Bill Rose

Top
dimazin
Posted: Sep 14 2008, 10:55 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


QUOTE (billyandtherockets @ Sep 14 2008, 09:25 AM)
Gentlemen: I wish to point out there is no FUTURE or PAST only NOW in every point of the universe. Time is a man made measurement, nothing more

If the man does not consider the past and the future then he cannot measure speed of motion in space and speed of movement into the future. You are similar to him.

You have applied not enough efforts to deny my formula.
Top
dimazin
Posted: Sep 24 2008, 04:18 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


Calculation of mass of a photon.
E'=mv^2/2

f=E"/E'
E=E"+E'
E=3,5158338*10^-19 J.
E'=mc^2/2
f=(E-E')/E'
f=c / L
c/L=(E-mc^2/2)/mc^2/2
c/L=(2E-mc^2)/mc^2
mc^3=2EL-mc^2L
mc^3+mc^2L=2EL
m=2EL/(c^3+c^2L)

m=1,4744996427992444e-50 kg

E - Energy of the photon =3,5158338e-19
E'-Energy of travel of a photon in space
E" - Energy of travel of a photon into the future
f - Frequency of fluctuation of a wave
c - speed of light =299792458 m/s
L - Length of the wave = 0,000 000 565 m
v - speed of travel in space
m - mass of a photon

Top
dimazin
Posted: Sep 24 2008, 06:17 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


There I mistaken.

f^2=E"/E'

then m=2EL^2/(c^4+c^2L^2)


m=2,7788967866e-65 kg
Top
dimazin
Posted: Oct 12 2008, 01:20 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 406
Joined: 22-January 08

Positive Feedback: 23.53%
Feedback Score: -86


I was wrong.
Impulse of speed of movement into the future - p'
m - mass
v - speed in space
S - speed of moving into the future s'/s
P - general momentum
E - kinetic energy
с - speed of light

S=1/(1-v^2/c^2)^1/2 - 1

p'=mvS

P=mv+mvS


Kinetic energy:

E=mc^2(S+1) - mc^2

E=mc^2S

Top
eyeque
Posted: Oct 12 2008, 01:29 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 351
Joined: 12-July 08

Positive Feedback: 25.81%
Feedback Score: -53


QUOTE (dimazin @ Jul 16 2008, 02:54 AM)
I was right, but my theory was wrong. Because there was no impulse (or energy) for speed of moving into the future, and true speed was very improbable.
v-true speed
V=v*1/(1-v^2/c^2)^1/2 -Prospective speed of moving in space

V-v=Transformed speed of moving in space into speed of moving into the future

A 15 year old could come up with a mor complicated algebraic expression.

Whats your f'n nam? Dimazin? thats a nasal spay for big snouted jews to clear their sinuses lol lolo lol, ypu liyyle piss ant, I'll rip your artms of and stuff them up your um lol, piss ant


--------------------
X^z = [YES][YES][YES] + [YES^z]7 = SQUARE TEN
Top

Topic Options Pages: (2) [1] 2 

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


 

Terms of use