| LoFi version for PDAs |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll |
| brent.tc |
Posted: Apr 26 2008, 03:26 PM
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 91 Joined: 10-January 08 Positive Feedback: 76.92% Feedback Score: 6 |
I was reading about antimatter the other day, and it mentioned that when antimatter collides with 'regular' matter, they produce pure energy... I was wondering, what exactly is PURE energy.
I asked a friend, but keep in mind that I am only a sophomore in high school, and my friends don't really know anything more than myself... They said that pure energy simply does not exist. Thanks for your help. -------------------- Interestingly, the only negative feedback I have is for giving an apparently hated member of physforum (dad1) a positive.
|
|
Send PM · Send email ·
|
| prometheus |
Posted: Apr 26 2008, 03:59 PM
|
|
Annoyed by you. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Power Member Posts: 1140 Joined: 1-November 07 Positive Feedback: 78.26% Feedback Score: 103 |
when a particles and it's antiparticle annihilate they produce what classically we would call light. Since it's pretty high energy light we would probably call it X rays or gamma rays.
However, annihilation of a particle and antiparticle is not really a classical event - it's described by quantum field theory. in QFT, light appears as particles called photons. Photons are massless and travel only at the speed of light c. Hope this helps. -------------------- Hac in hora sine mora corde pulsum tangite. - O Fortuna from Carmina Burana
For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little: - Isaiah 10:28 |
|
Send PM · Send email ·
|
| mr_homm |
Posted: Apr 26 2008, 07:39 PM
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Power Member Posts: 881 Joined: 31-March 06 Positive Feedback: 96.83% Feedback Score: 143 |
Here's another way to look at it:
In quantum mechanics, every particle has certain "quantum numbers" associated with it, which describe its identity. For instance, the electron has a "lepton number" of +1, a charge of -1, and a spin of 1/2. When particles interact, all of these numbers are CONSERVED, like energy is conserved. This is very similar to balancing a chemical reaction: the numbers on both sides of the reaction must match to ensure that everything balances out. There are other numbers, such as baryon number, strangeness, charm, (yes, physicists choose some odd names for things), which are USUALLY conserved, unless the so-called weak force gets involved. Anyway, the point is that when a particle and its antiparticle annihilate each other, all of their quantum numbers are precisely opposite, so the net number is zero. The photons that are created have all zeroes as their quantum numbers, except for spin. They have a spin of 1. So the idea is that when other particles annihilate into photons, you can ask about the photons, is it a lepton? (no), is it a baryon? (no) is it charged? (no) is it strange? (no), is it charmed? (no), is it spinning? (yes). Therefore the photon seems to be nothing but "spinning energy" without any other identity. I think this is what people mean when they say that it is "pure" energy. Of course, there is a lot more to the story, but I think this is a fair representation of the point of view that labels photons as pure energy. Hope that helps! --Stuart Anderson -------------------- A hallmark of intelligence is the ability to give precise answers to vague questions.
|
| Sapo |
Posted: Apr 26 2008, 07:52 PM
|
|
Unregistered |
Stuart, thank you, as usual for bringing light to the discussion.
A photon is a wiggle between electric field and magnetic field, classically, I think. What handedness are photons? Does that have something to do with polarization? Could one detect an 'anti-photon' as being any different from a 'pro-photon'? My assumption is no, but why? Sorry for asking for an entire course précis on Saturday... |
|
|
| sp1034 |
Posted: Apr 26 2008, 07:53 PM
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 40 Joined: 23-October 07 Positive Feedback: 100% Feedback Score: 1 |
its also a form of theta radiation
|
| Sapo |
Posted: Apr 26 2008, 08:27 PM
|
|
Unregistered |
OK.
Star Trek answers aren't real, for God's sake, spacepuppy. |
|
|
| Precursor562 |
Posted: Apr 27 2008, 10:32 PM
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1333 Joined: 20-June 06 Positive Feedback: 42.5% Feedback Score: -46 |
Energy is simply motion.
-------------------- Time is the wisest counsellor
|
|
Send PM · Send email ·
|
|
Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll |