Einsteins Theory, re mass?

Here is a change to Einsteins Theory

Concerning the theory of relativity:

It is suggested that:

Energy= mass and constant, s sq.
should be be changed to
Energy= strength of the magnetic field, s and constant, s sq
as in magnetic generator.
E=mc2
changes to
E=smc2

Copyright December 14,1996

Remember , Einstein himself was not 100% sure of his theory and even said that if a better theory were to come along , his theory should be discarded. There is no mass only strength of magnetic field(s)
I am not pushing this on anybody, but it's time to go beyond 1930's physics.

I don't think I get it

That's okay, I don't think the rest of us do either.

Sometimes I start to doubt Einstein's theory of relativity as something rather unpragmatic. I mean, what if a car that moves at a very high speed enters a parking of small size, and the observer in the parking, watch the speeding car deaccelerate. Assuming the length expands due to decreasing speed, would the car then just get large and hit the celling...I mean I am more inclined to newtonian physics because it gives results and thou light speed is the same in all frames, I dont know it is too much for me; maybe my brain can not see forth dimensionaly.

At relativistic velocities, length only contracts in the direction of motion. So, when decelerating, your car would only expand from front to back. The ceiling should not be damaged. Hope that helps a little.

Correct. hehe. I mean the idea of expansion as the result of decreasing speed just sounds a little absurd to me. Correct. However, if the car was moving at angle to the parking floor , then it would expand in both dimensions. Or maybe the parking's door open to the sky for a space ship or etc. Anyhow , the thing is that I am just not able to comprehend it since well, we are all too comonly are brought up on strict Newtonian concepts of a universal frame. Ether to me sounds more plausible but of course we all know nobody can prove it and it makes little sense

It's hard to understand something that goes against everything else you've ever experienced.

I think it was easier for me because I didn't really pay attention to anything until I learned about Special Relativitiy...

Well I have to say I'm a little disapointed.
I wouldnt have a clue If this has any merit or not.
But I think what chance does the future of science have if the rising scientists of tomorrow look at everything with a closed mind now.
Things that we have learned and "know" to be a fact have been proven wrong before.
It would be a horrible waist of a scientific career, if one here was smart enough to work out a new form or type of technolagy, just to never develop the idea, because of a belief in some thing that was actually wrong (even if all conventional teachings say other wise).

However, you have to develop an idea before it can show any merit. I'm not against new ideas, but if they don't work by explaining phenomena, it doesn't make any sense to accept them.

Hi All,

For those who are not able to read up on the issue I suggest that you have a look at this site.
Einstein's Universe
In it there are a number of graphic movies (beware - not streaming video). They are the tiny red camera icon next to the annotation. Watch out for the incorrectly calibrated speedo's on the motorbikes but it is "indicative" of the facts. There are two movies in particular that show what really happens and what is seen by external observers. One shows the bike passing near the speed of light. It appears to have a "rotation" in 3 space. This is the optical consequence of length contraction.
14 Length Contraction : "...slightly rotated away from us."
Another shows two bikes traveling parallel down the road near C and they throw a ball to each other and we compare the paths the ball takes relate to them and to the external observer. To the bike riders the ball travels straight across and to the external observer it travels on a diagonal. That is all there is to the theory... a "glorified" expression of Pythagoras' Theorem. Look... See... Go figure!
15 Length Contraction: "...this line to this line."
You will thank yourself for doing it. Also length contraction is only in the direction of travel not in the perpendicular directions.

Why not spend another quarter hour and learn "everything there is to know" about Special and General Relativity? He he he!

Cheers

Im not that silly Elf, I dont think I can learn every thing about realtivity in 15 minutes.
Maby an hour (j/k)