Challenging Dominant Physics Paradigms, is not more than challenging

Dear Alphanumeric,

I have noticed, by the way, in relation to some of your posts that you have met Dr. Michael Green. Perhaps at some point when the occasion arises you may wish to ask him about Dr. Carlos Castro Perelman whose work I have been obviously championing. Dr. Green is familiar with his work as well and would be able to offer a far more cogent assessment in terms that will be meaningful to you than I.

In all honesty, I do not know in advance what he would say.

Kindest Regards,
Raphie

P.S. For those unfamiliar with Michael Green, he is the John Humphrey Plummer Professor of Theoretical Physics, Theoretical High Energy Particle Physics Group at Cambridge. For more, see...
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/mbg15/

This post has been edited by Raphie Frank on Nov 20 2007, 09:55 PM

To Lalbatros (Posted: Oct 31 2007, 08:20 AM): you stated,

"I did not find any reference to the scientific method, did you?"

I agree, not from what you quoted, and without reading the link for further information, a balanced approach is scientific, for the nave, that me, "It's not easy being me, master of me own desk-TOE-me" (Pop-eyes' father).

But who's balanced? Women more likely than men.

To Troi Futjita: In your first link and second link, the word "segmentation" of some initial starting place and time, I cannot find a definition.

http://www.geocities.jp/imyfujita/galaxy/galaxy02.html

{{Fascinating Objects in the Space
Gravity is not a force but a curved field in the space-time continuum that is created by the presence of mass.
And this curved field would not be symmetric for all directions.
by Iori Onestone Fujita Grossfeld}}

However, with the magic odd number, three (3) and Hans Delmelt's triplet regular (equal sided) 1/3 charged lepton measured from a single positron observed oscillating at 60 mega hertz Electromagnetic field for over a month in a static applied magnetic field, the gyromagnetic ratio was measured out to 2.0000 to sixteen decimal places (the local standard for the speed of light?).

Likewise, the opposite discharge from the accretion disk of a galaxy, 1/10 radian gamma rays, some radian or so of protons and I quess some negative charges, maybe, unless the negatives go in the opposite direction from the center; and, as well as from the accretion disk at spots off center, says to me, you should blend in such ideas to your nice web sights.

Majkl (Posted: Oct 31 2007, 10:19 PM): You wrote:

{{There are ample examples of high-redshift quasars that are physically connected to low-redshift galaxies, and there is evidence that red shift is quantized.}}

Trying to comprehend what you are stating. It seems to make sense, one of the quasar's axial out puts sweeps by our observation lab, if galaxy it is located within is receding, so each emmission from it coming our way should also be red shifted.

The spectrum "finger print" may be shifted also.

But how does this understanding make Hubble Expansion a figment?

Raphie Frank (Posted: Nov 2 2007, 10:25 AM):

Moderators? I thought this form was more like a graduate siminar, so I looked at the Cornell web sight. Found a course description, graduate course in quantumm mechanics, was going to paste, but lost in cyber sapce, but...

Of course "lock and key" is what our USA Dept of Treasury uses on the back of the paper money, the secrecy seal, which is not followed these days of "War on Terror".

Science to the rescue! When it doubt, assume the polarity is symmetrical, the galaxy can still remain neutral if the positive and negative charges are separate, and in opposite directions throughout the galaxy accretion disk for those pulsars seem to correspond to recent measurements, but opposite outside the more central core, protons to keep the central origin neutral and the disk would require opposite negatives, that appear to be discharging from the entire accretion disk.

Got the ideas about this, especially in regards to our Earth's Van Allen belts, that the positive masses end up in Antarctica, the negatives in the Arctic as water.

So much to read, these discussions challenge us all, I hope.

Best, rmuldavin

I'm no longer at Cambridge, I am elsewhere for my PhD. As such, short of a physics conference sometime in the next 3 years, I won't be crossing paths with him.

==============================================
A letter from Dr. Carlos Handy to ArXiv in support of blacklisted scientist Dr. Carlos Castro Perelman, affiliate of the Center for Theoretical Studies of Physical Systems in Atlanta, Georgia.
==============================================

Lest anyone question why Dr. Castro Perelman -- whom I have written many posts regarding upon this thread -- is not listed upon the Theoretical Studies of Physical Systems in Atlanta, Georgia website (See... http://www.cau.edu/research/ctsps.html ), as at least one former Ivy League Academic I have been in correspondence with has noted, this email from Dr. Carlos Handy will explain why in conjunction with the following statement from Dr. Castro Perelman.

"The affiliates names of the CTSPS don't appear in the website, only the permanent members do. "

Handy, grandson to blues legend WC Handy, is currently Physics Department Head and Professor at Texas Southern University.
http://physics.tsu.edu/People/Handy/handy.php

------------------
key excerpt...
------------------
We recognize that he is controversial, but in those matters of particular concern and interest to us, he has always been very insightful and credible. We do not like the impression of an intellectual mafia that seems to be engaged in scientific censorship.

========================

Tue, 1 Jul 2003 08:42:01 -0400
Sender: handyman@hyper.cau.edu
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 08:42:01 -0400
From: Carlos R. Handy handyman@ctsps.cau.edu
To: moderation for arXiv.org moderation@arXiv.org
Carlos Castro czarlosromanov@yahoo.com, handyman@ctsps.cau.edu
Subject: Re: Carlos Castro

To Whom It May Concern:

My name is Dr. Carlos R. Handy, Co-Director of the Center for Theoretical Studies of Physical Systems, and well known to Dr. Fred Cooper, formerly at LANL T-8 (where I served as post-doc, 1978 - 81), and now at NSF.

Dr. Carlos Castro, an American citizen, is an affiliate of our Center, and has been one for at least six years. He has published papers with the name of our center, and university (Clark Atlanta University, not ``Atlantic''). We recognize that he is controversial, but in those matters of particular concern and interest to us, he has always been very insightful and credible. We do not like the impression of an intellectual mafia that seems to be engaged in scientific censorship. More specifically, in the past, Dr. Ginzparg has made e-mail remarks to Dr. Fred Cooper, concerning our support of Dr. Castro, that we have regarded as prejudiced and offensive. This should be particularly troubling to your organization, which continues to enjoy government support.

I would be glad to submit a written letter, but I trust, with the particular reference to Dr. Cooper, that this might not be necessary. In any case, please send me your specific address, and I will mail such a letter immediately.

I understand that your archives should not be the repository for any irresponsible, purportedly scientific articles, however, we (CTSPS) do not support everyone, and until such time that Dr. Castro behaves in a manner questionable to us, we will continue to support him.

Sincerely,

Dr. Carlos R. Handy
Associate Professor of Physics
Co-Director, CTSPS

========================

from...
My Struggle with Ginsparg (arXiv.org) and the Road to Cyberia:
A ScientiÞc-Gulag in Cyberspace
http://www.archivefreedom.org/freedom/Cyberia.html


PUBLICLY LISTED CONTACT INFORMATION FOR CARLOS HANDY
Professor,Texas Southern University,
Department of Physics
3100 Cleburne Ave., Houston, Texas 77004
e-mail:handycr@tsu.edu

This post has been edited by Raphie Frank on Nov 22 2007, 05:28 AM

Of course CENSORSHIP couldn't happen HERE, not in America, right?

=============================================
Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime. - Potter Stewart
=============================================

February 23, 2004

Ms. Geraldine Miller, Chairman
State Board of Education
Texas Education Agency
1701 North Congress Avenue
Austin, TX 78701-1494

Dear Chairman Miller:

excerpt...
I wish to bring to your attention a most serious issue. For the past two months, Board member Dr. Don McLeroy and Chief Deputy Commissioner Robert Scott have been attempting to accomplish the goals of the Discovery Institute to censor the biology textbooks under the guise of "factual error correction" after the final vote by the State Board to adopt all the books...

excerpt...
As you know, Texas derives its power to censor textbooks from its highly-centralized authoritarian adoption process and enormous purchasing power, allowing it to force publishers to make changes of factual errors and include content to match the state's science curriculum requirements...

excerpt
The frequent consequence of the Texas textbook adoption process has been the deliberate intimidation and extortion of textbook publishers resulting in censorship of reliable and factual educational content--the diminishing, distortion, and deletion of sound scientific, social, historical, health, environmental, and economic information. Many studies reveal that Texas students are less able to perform at the college level than students from other states, and Texas student exam scores continue to rank near the bottom of all states...

excerpt
Despite the current result--that publishers refused to censor the biology textbooks after yet another round of official intimidation by TEA administrators and a SBOE member--the actions of Don McLeroy and Robert Scott were irregular and unethical (what one might term "semi-legal") and probably illegal

Very truly yours,

Steven D. Schafersman, Ph.D.
President, Texas Citizens for Science

===============================
View the rest of the letter here...
http://texscience.org/files/discovery/miller.htm
===============================


The Texas Citizens for Science Website
http://www.txscience.org/

Texas Citizens for Science
P. O. Box 13022
Odessa, TX 79768-3022
Web: www.txscience.org

================================

Read Comments on the issue by RPENNER on the following thread...

"the Verdict On Intelligent Design"
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...ndpost&p=285467