Shrinking Kilogram Bewilders Physicists., A possible answer to the mystery.

A possible answer to the mystery of the shrinking "master" kilogram would be to measure the weight of the "master" kilogram at the exact same time of the year as when it was originally weighed. The speed of the planet, relative to the sun, vary throughout the year, therefore the "master" kilogram's; inertial mass and weight will also vary throughout the year. The earth's energy level relative to space vary (space energy level) in proportion to its speed relative to the sun. According to my theory the "master" kilogram should be slightly more massive in July (aphelion) then it is in January (perihelion).

I don't know how they weigh it with such precision but it cannot be with a balance scale since the balancing weight would also be heavier. Naturally at this level of precision, the latitude and the locale's gravity strength must also be taken into careful consideration.

Donald L. Hamilton, author of "The Mind of Mankind" - Published, Suna Press 1996, http://novan.com/mind.htm
Reference: Chapter 12, "The Birth of the Earth" and drawing on page 128.

The way they discovered the loss was by comparison with the other 5 or 6 "copies". So, there is no doubt that the effect is due to loss of matter, not to variation of revolution speed and/or proximity to the Sun.

This post has been edited by Dallas on Sep 18 2007, 02:42 AM

The opposit is true, it will weigh less.

The "Shrinking Kilogram Mystery" is most probably the simple consequence of abrasion due the primitive and somewhat drastic "cleaning methods", especially the usage of hot vapor, followed by mechanical wiping. Iridium-platinum alloy is much soften, then the stainless steel. Note that the etalon is manipulated without gloves. A poor prototype!



This post has been edited by Zephir on Sep 18 2007, 10:06 PM

Where did you get these pictures? They do not represent the manipulation of the kilogram etalon for the simple reason that it is not being handled. You just made up the whole thing

This post has been edited by Dallas on Sep 19 2007, 12:55 AM

Yep, the pictures above were rendered in 3D graphics package...

Actually (according to my theory), the planets oscillate across the path of the sun as it speeds along with the other stars in the galaxy. From January to July the earth is behind the sun's path and is gaining speed as it falls toward the speeding sun. In July it is at its greatest velocity and furthest distance from the sun as it passes the sun. Now, being in front of the sun, it begins to slow until it is at its slowest and closest to the sun in January when the the earth is passed by the sun and the cycle starts all over again. (The apparent motion of the planets and the real motion are two different things.) Since the earth is actually speeding the fastest in July the inertial mass of the kilogram would be very slightly greater in July.

Don Hamilton http://novan.com/

If the AWT explanation of iridium standard meter expansion is correct, then the same model can explain the evaporation of matter during the collapse of Universe. The vacuum simple gets more dense and the density difference between matter and vacuum decrease, thus making the prototype relatively lighter.

The only problem is, how such difference can be measure by comparison of the copies of prototype by double lever balance. If the prototype gets less dense, then every its copy should get less dense too.

Any ideas?

[snip the obligatory BS by AWT]

I already explained to you that only the "standard" kg kept at Sevres became lighter than the 5 existent copies. By comparison with the "copies" it was found out about the loss of weight in the "standard". What is so difficult for you to understand such an elementary thing?

dallas i think we should all refuse to talk to unregisterd members because they are mostly bad people who have been banned. zephir can talk to himself. lets all ignore him.

Yep, I know about it.

This is just the reason, I cannot assign this effect to the same category, like the elongation of iridium meter prototype.

Then why do you keep posting stupidities on this subject?

Obviously, either because he still can, or because he can't help it. He's just slightly less gusty as a guest...

If the AWT explanation of iridium prototype is correct, it would mean, the gravitational constant has decreased over time, so I'm analyzing the situation, bacause the weight loss would depend on the balance type used.

You remind of Ahmedinejad. He is a megalomaniac and impervious to logic, but perhaps not as stupid.