Scientific Forums


 

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


> A Ball Of Nerve!, A very hard question guaranteed no answer
einstienear
  Posted: Sep 3 2007, 07:20 AM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 131
Joined: 31-August 07

Positive Feedback: 32%
Feedback Score: -42


This may be rather difficult question!!! who ever answerer's it must be extreemly smart!!!
A small plastic ball with a mass of 6.50 x 10^-3 kg and with a charge of +0.150 uC is suspended from an insulating thread and hangs between the plates of a capacitor .The ball is in equilibrium, with the thread making an angle of 30.0 degrees with respect to the vertical. the area of each plate is 0.0150 m^2. what is the magnitude of the charge on each plate?


3. The attempt at a solution

I tried to find q using Q = mg/E, but it ended up in a mess since I was looking for the magnitude. The area is throwing me off...I don't know how to utilize it. Honestly, this is a very tough question! would love it if you answer it......
i now know the answer....but will give you it...only after you die of nerve!!!
hahahaa!!

This post has been edited by einstienear on Sep 3 2007, 07:27 AM


--------------------
founder of the counter mafia!!!

Mo counter FM




Assassin

Top
AlphaNumeric
Posted: Sep 3 2007, 08:16 AM


Professional mathematician
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 10336
Joined: 16-June 06

Positive Feedback: 84.15%
Feedback Score: 420


Suppose the charge density of the plates is σ and -σ respectively. Given you know their area, A, can you compute the electric field produced by each plate alone? Using superposition you can then combine the fields of the two plates to compute the field felt by the charge.

You know the angle the charge's teather makes with the vertical, so you can compute the vertical and horizontal components of the force on the charged mass.

You know that the horizontal force due to the two plates is equal to the horizontal component of the force on the charge due to the teether and gravity. From this, you can set up an equation which relates σ to the charge and mass of the object. Rearrange and solve.

Is this sufficent or do you need more specific pointers?


--------------------
The views in the above post are those of its author and not those of the people who educated him through a degree and masters, supervised him or collaborated with him during his PhD, paid him to teach and mark undergraduate mathematics and physics courses or who pay him to do research now.

Any insults, flames or rants are purely the work of the author and not said people or institutions. Cranks are not suffered well.
Top
einstienear
Posted: Sep 3 2007, 09:32 AM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 131
Joined: 31-August 07

Positive Feedback: 32%
Feedback Score: -42


So you may have a point....but do you want to have more time before i give you the answer??


--------------------
founder of the counter mafia!!!

Mo counter FM




Assassin

Top
fleem
Posted: Sep 3 2007, 11:52 AM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 236
Joined: 31-January 07

Positive Feedback: 72.73%
Feedback Score: 6


You can't figure this out because you don't know how far apart the plates are, nor do you know the shape of the plates.

This post has been edited by fleem on Sep 3 2007, 11:54 AM


--------------------
"What's for dinner?" - Albert Einstein, June 14, 1947
Send PM ·
Top
AlphaNumeric
Posted: Sep 3 2007, 01:33 PM


Professional mathematician
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 10336
Joined: 16-June 06

Positive Feedback: 84.15%
Feedback Score: 420


QUOTE (einstienear @ Sep 3 2007, 10:32 AM)
So you may have a point....but do you want to have more time before i give you the answer??

I was under the impression you wanted help in how to solve it, hence why I gave a general overview in how to go about solving it. I know how to solve the system, I'm familiar with electromagnetics.

If you were trying to get people on the forum to solve it, you should have made that clearer, rather than giving the distinct impression you've been given this for homework and cant' work out how to do it.
QUOTE (Fleem @ Sep 3 2007, 10:32 AM)
You can't figure this out because you don't know how far apart the plates are, nor do you know the shape of the plates.
Ignoring fringe effects from plate edges, the shape isn't important and the distance between plates isn't either because you can get by knowing the field is uniform between the plates. What's important is the charge on them.


--------------------
The views in the above post are those of its author and not those of the people who educated him through a degree and masters, supervised him or collaborated with him during his PhD, paid him to teach and mark undergraduate mathematics and physics courses or who pay him to do research now.

Any insults, flames or rants are purely the work of the author and not said people or institutions. Cranks are not suffered well.
Top
fleem
Posted: Sep 3 2007, 03:11 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 236
Joined: 31-January 07

Positive Feedback: 72.73%
Feedback Score: 6


QUOTE (AlphaNumeric @ Sep 3 2007, 07:33 AM)

Ignoring fringe effects from plate edges [...]

Well, it does depend on the precision desired, doesn't it.

I admit that if I had this on a test, I would be forced to assume a very low ratio of plate separation to plate area simply to come up with SOME answer. But I think I'd place a note after my answer or speak to the teacher afterward.

From the description of the problem, I don't believe there is much reason to think the ratio of plate separation to plate area is extremely low. I don't consider a practical interpretation of the word "capacitor" implying it--I've seen vacuum capacitors that were not much more than a couple of aluminum disks on sticks--and that's typically the sort of capacitor used in lab experiments like that described here. In fact, considering the density of most plastics, and thus the size of that plastic ball compared to the plate area, that ratio looks like it is quite high, here. Nor is a desired precision specified. Now I'm not saying we need to go so far as to consider the Casimir field or the extra space-time curvature contributed by the field's stress-energy tensor! But I am saying that using classical electrostatics, even a capacitor that has, for example, a ratio of plate separation to plate area of 1/20 will certainly need that considered to obtain a precision of a couple decimal places.

This post has been edited by fleem on Sep 3 2007, 03:14 PM


--------------------
"What's for dinner?" - Albert Einstein, June 14, 1947
Send PM ·
Top
fleem
Posted: Sep 3 2007, 03:19 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 236
Joined: 31-January 07

Positive Feedback: 72.73%
Feedback Score: 6


Heh, I just thought of something anal (I would, wouldn't I)

That string holding the ball is at a 30 degree angle. For that string to fit between the plates, that places a lower limit on the ratio of plate separation to plate area that is QUITE high. (Yeah, OK, its lame, I know)


--------------------
"What's for dinner?" - Albert Einstein, June 14, 1947
Send PM ·
Top
Confused2
Posted: Sep 3 2007, 10:31 PM


Retreating member
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 4893
Joined: 8-November 05

Positive Feedback: 63.06%
Feedback Score: -43


My 'take' on this would be to assume the field between the plates is uniform so
we get the force on the suspended charge from E = -V/d where d is the separation of the two plates
from this we know V/d = k1

The capacitance C = permittivity * A /d
= k2 / d

since V/d = k1

V = k1 d

Charge would then be Q = C V

hence Q = k1 d * k2/d

Edit .. I see AN said this a while back.

This post has been edited by Confused2 on Sep 3 2007, 11:06 PM


--------------------
Anything completed in less than twenty years is likely to be hurried and unsatisfying.
Top
Farsight
Posted: Sep 5 2007, 11:43 AM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1917
Joined: 30-September 06

Positive Feedback: 45.59%
Feedback Score: -214


Why don't you leave it with us eineinear? We'll write it all including the exact answer, all ready for the morning, then you can pick it up just before you head off to school.
Top
fleem
Posted: Sep 5 2007, 05:29 PM


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 236
Joined: 31-January 07

Positive Feedback: 72.73%
Feedback Score: 6


QUOTE (Farsight @ Sep 5 2007, 05:43 AM)
Why don't you leave it with us eineinear? We'll write it all including the exact  answer, all ready for the morning, then you can pick it up just before you head off to school.

laugh.gif


--------------------
"What's for dinner?" - Albert Einstein, June 14, 1947
Send PM ·
Top

Topic Options

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


 

Terms of use