Scientific Forums


 

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


> Attack here, c'mon
thinkbig!
Posted: Mar 24 2007, 08:53 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 301
Joined: 6-January 07

Positive Feedback: 42.86%
Feedback Score: -21


Here, this ought to be fun.

Consider the following analogy.

If you went down the street and saw a quarter on the sidewalk, you would think naturally, "someone dropped a quarter." If you went down the street and saw a handful of quarters on the sidewalk, you would think, "Someone had a big hole in their pockets, or dropped a roll of quarters." But if you went down the street and saw one hundred quarters on the sidewalk and they were all carefully balanced precariously on their edges, you would have to think somebody did this deliberately. The Universe as we know it, is that carefully balanced. This theory is known as the Strong Anthropic Principle. The only possibility other than this Universe was created, is there are so many universes that the equivalent of one hundred quarters falling out of someone's pocket and ALL of them ending up balanced on their edges occurred, completely by random chance. This theory is known as the, "Weak Anthropic Principle." So if you are a rational thinker here are your only two choices. Either this Universe was created , or that there are multitudes of Universes.
biggrin.gif
What do you think?? Yeah, YOU!!

This post has been edited by thinkbig! on Mar 24 2007, 08:54 PM
Top
thinkbig!
Posted: Mar 24 2007, 08:55 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 301
Joined: 6-January 07

Positive Feedback: 42.86%
Feedback Score: -21


I just stumbled upon this and found it interesting. This is just to start friendly discussion. NOT TO PROVE EITHER SIDE. We all know where that gets us. Debate, is good, arguing is not. GO.

This post has been edited by thinkbig! on Mar 24 2007, 08:58 PM
Top
Nick
Posted: Mar 24 2007, 09:09 PM


-- LIGHT FELL --
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5292
Joined: 3-June 05

Positive Feedback: 58.82%
Feedback Score: -40


QUOTE (thinkbig! @ Mar 24 2007, 08:53 PM)
Here, this ought to be fun.

Consider the following analogy.

If you went down the street and saw a quarter on the sidewalk, you would think naturally, "someone dropped a quarter." If you went down the street and saw a handful of quarters on the sidewalk, you would think, "Someone had a big hole in their pockets, or dropped a roll of quarters." But if you went down the street and saw one hundred quarters on the sidewalk and they were all carefully balanced precariously on their edges, you would have to think somebody did this deliberately. The Universe as we know it, is that carefully balanced. This theory is known as the Strong Anthropic Principle. The only possibility other than this Universe was created, is there are so many universes that the equivalent of one hundred quarters falling out of someone's pocket and ALL of them ending up balanced on their edges occurred, completely by random chance. This theory is known as the, "Weak Anthropic Principle." So if you are a rational thinker here are your only two choices. Either this Universe was created , or that there are multitudes of Universes.
biggrin.gif
What do you think?? Yeah, YOU!!

THE MULTIPLE UNIVERSE CONCEPT IS FOR ATHEISTS. AFTER ALL IF THERE IS NOTHING BIGGER TO PUT THE UNIVERSE INTO ALL THAT IS LEFT IS THIS ONE UNIVERSE THAT HAD TO BE CREATED BY GOD. THE SUPERVERSE IS THE THING THE ATHEISTS USE TO FIT THE UNIVERSE INTO WITHOUT THE NECESSITY OF THERE BEING A GOD.

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF THIS UNIVERSE?

US.

MITCH RAEMSCH -- LIGHT FALL --
Top
thinkbig!
Posted: Mar 24 2007, 09:20 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 301
Joined: 6-January 07

Positive Feedback: 42.86%
Feedback Score: -21


QUOTE (Nick @ Mar 24 2007, 09:09 PM)
THE MULTIPLE UNIVERSE CONCEPT IS FOR ATHEISTS. AFTER ALL IF THERE IS NOTHING BIGGER TO PUT THE UNIVERSE INTO ALL THAT IS LEFT IS THIS ONE UNIVERSE THAT HAD TO BE CREATED BY GOD. THE SUPERVERSE IS THE THING THE ATHEISTS USE TO FIT THE UNIVERSE INTO WITHOUT THE NECESSITY OF THERE BEING A GOD.

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF THIS UNIVERSE?

US.

MITCH RAEMSCH -- LIGHT FALL --

Just wanted to say that the lack of Anger and Meanness is much appreciated. wink.gif
Top
adoucette
Posted: Mar 24 2007, 11:06 PM


Illegitimi non carborundum
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 12894
Joined: 14-April 05

Positive Feedback: 77.59%
Feedback Score: 205


How would you tell where one Universe begins and the other ends?

Arthur


--------------------
"We cannot prove that those are in error who tell us that society has reached a turning point; that we have seen our best days. But so said all before us, and with just as much apparent reason. On what principle is it that, when we see nothing but improvement behind us, we are to expect nothing but deterioration before us?"

Thomas B. Macaulay
Top
thinkbig!
Posted: Mar 24 2007, 11:27 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 301
Joined: 6-January 07

Positive Feedback: 42.86%
Feedback Score: -21


QUOTE (adoucette @ Mar 24 2007, 11:06 PM)
How would you tell where one Universe begins and the other ends?

Arthur

It's just like everything else. You don't know until you find out. So, if there is a way to know that, it's a secret for now. Until someone figures it out.
Top
kjw
Posted: Mar 25 2007, 02:35 AM


LHC! LHC! LHC!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1338
Joined: 24-May 06

Positive Feedback: 91.18%
Feedback Score: 56


thinkbig!
QUOTE
Today at 6:53 AM So if you are a rational thinker here are your only two choices. Either this Universe was created , or that there are multitudes of Universes.
a rational thinker would not exclude the possibility that a multitude of universes were part of the creation, or that what we experience as the universe is actually the possibility, no matter how unlikely, that a 100 dropped quarters will all land on their side.
Top
kaneda
Posted: Mar 25 2007, 04:09 PM


Nothing is beyond question
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5044
Joined: 6-November 06

Positive Feedback: 59.46%
Feedback Score: 4


thinkbig! Some say there could have been a million failed universes before this when everything was right so it survived. Regardless, gravity pulls things down, photons travel at C, etc. If you drop a quarter, it can land heads or tails, or on it's side. It does not suddenly turn into a flower and bloom. A universe might just be the way forces naturally work.

Consider the analogy : A magician waves his arms, says the magic word and from nothing, everything appears. How can this be done? Because people who believe in it say it can. But who made the magician? His believers say he was always there. Evidence they have none. So why not the universe was always there and get rid of this impossible magician?

This post has been edited by kaneda on Mar 25 2007, 04:10 PM


--------------------
pupamancur is : Rabbit, Dallas, LearmSceince, Gizmo, Gehn, Alpha, BenTheMan, LeTUOtter, Charles Lee Ray and probably others. So little time, so much hate to post.
Top
Kaeroll
Posted: Mar 25 2007, 04:29 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 16-May 05

Positive Feedback: 90%
Feedback Score: 19


QUOTE ("Douglas Adams")
Man the maker looks at his world and says 'So who made this then?' Who made this? — you can see why it's a treacherous question. Early man thinks, 'Well, because there's only one sort of being I know about who makes things, whoever made all this must therefore be a much bigger, much more powerful and necessarily invisible, one of me and because I tend to be the strong one who does all the stuff, he's probably male'. And so we have the idea of a god. Then, because when we make things we do it with the intention of doing something with them, early man asks himself , 'If he made it, what did he make it for?' Now the real trap springs, because early man is thinking, 'This world fits me very well. Here are all these things that support me and feed me and look after me; yes, this world fits me nicely' and he reaches the inescapable conclusion that whoever made it, made it for him.

This is rather as if you imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, 'This is an interesting world I find myself in—an interesting hole I find myself in—fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!'

I've always found this an interesting take on the matter.

Kaeroll


--------------------
"At least two thirds of our miseries spring from human stupidity, human malice and those great motivators and justifiers of malice and stupidity, idealism, dogmatism and proselytizing zeal on behalf of religious or political idols."
- Aldous Huxley

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science."
- Charles Darwin
Top
El_Machinae
Posted: Mar 26 2007, 01:47 PM


Advanced Member
*****

Group: Power Member
Posts: 2455
Joined: 17-January 06

Positive Feedback: 87.76%
Feedback Score: 54


I dropped a glass on a piece of pavement, and then looked at the pieces. After a bit, I started to notice a pattern between the pieces, right angles seemed to be non-existant, obtuse angels were more common in the larger pieces, etc.

If you examine a process long enough, you can usually find a pattern.

Of course, this lead me to believe that those pieces of glass were put there on purpose and that their patterns were arranged to show me that some intelligent designer broke the pieces merely to prove his existence.

Or not. Maybe the patterns I was seeing was merely an intelligent mind examining the results of a natural process.

This post has been edited by El_Machinae on Mar 26 2007, 01:47 PM


--------------------
Curing aging needs momentum
-> http://www.senescence.info/aging_cure.html
Please help, pro-actively, speed the cure.
Send PM ·
Top

Topic Options

Add reply · Start new topic · Start new poll


 

Terms of use