Solid State Universe, A New Perspective on an Old Cosmology

I've devised a brief explanation of how to describe that Universe as a Hypersphere that I believe would answer certain questions concerning the Origin and eventual Fate of our neck of the woods.

It makes assumptions regarding the nature of spacetime and singularities and draws connections our of human mythology.

Specifically, this cosmology is actually the oldest cosmology in human history, just reinterpreted to reflect 'modern' knowledge.

I hope you find it entertaining.

http:\\morlock.newdor.com/Solid%20State%20Universe.doc

I should add that the Solid State Universe theory has large ramifications that apply to the concept of Hawking Radiation.

Simply put, under this cosmology Hawking Radiation should not exist.

And attempts at verifying the existence of such a radiation using the Large Hadron Collider will prove unsuccessful and possibly catastropic in the long term.

This is not good, because from the AWT the Hawking's Radiation concept follows by rather simple way.

This post has been edited by Zephir on Dec 16 2006, 01:14 AM

Thats a shame. Because then there really must be a flaw in your framework. Hawking Radiation would not be able to exist in a closed Universe.

But if you want to try to adapt your AWT research to this model, go right ahead.

Just remember... closed system. Eternal Universe recreating an Infinite supply of galaxies.

Oh... and we're currently the accelerated implosion of spacetime, not the accelerated metric expansion of space.

Red shift on a galactic level is just an illusion of distance. The singularities and mass of galaxies are actually imploding the spacetime between galaxies.

I'd appreciate any comments or questions regarding this topology.

I'm not getting much back when it gets sent out.

This is a counter-argument against Hawking Radiation, based on a topological analysis.

http:\\morlock.newdor.com/Solid%20State%20Universe.doc

I am too new to this forum. I cannot post a direct link.

I believe the experiments being conducted by CERN will have longterm consequences for humanity.

Stephen Hawking is a brain in a jar who has lost his mind.

He is planning on forcing mankind to leave this planet through the development of at least one black hole in the LHC facilities.

One mini-black hole would not immediately consume Earth. It would move like a bullet, orbiting Earth's gravity well. This would be the real Hawking Radiation.

This man has clearly lost his mind. Experiments at CERN must be stopped at all costs.

Eden is at stake.

It was enough to read about the illusion of metric expansion, and it was clear that this theory isn't compatible with what we know from observations and results of a vast number of experiments.

Why you think so? Are you afraid that particles moving at relativistic speeds can create a black hole? I can tell you that everyday the earth is bombarded with high energetic particles from outer space. Many of these particles are having much larger energies than what can be created at CERN. So, you can relax!

I think you should keep your personal opinions about Mr. Hawking to yourself. Believe me, with such attitudes to people, you'll hardly be taken seriously.

--
Geir

What do you think the Van Allen Radiation belts are?

This post has been edited by Solid State Universe on Dec 17 2006, 08:21 AM

The earth is rotating. The inner core of the earth is soft and has electromagnetic properties. The movement of the inner mass differs with depth. This creates a magnetic field that changes the direction of incoming charged particles from outer space. How much the particle direction is bent or being changed depends on the speed and the charge of the particles. This will lead to a number of collisions between particles. Characteristic belts of plasma are created in this process, and this is that we call the Van Allen Radiation belts. Even so, many particles do not interact with the magnetic field, or do not collide with other particles until they reach the inner atmosphere. Some particles will even pass through the inner atmosphere and hit the earth. A few particles can even pass straight through the earth without interacting with anything.

--
GR

They would still qualify as singularities.

http:\\morlock.newdor.com/quantumatom.PNG

wrong post, sorry...

This post has been edited by Duality on Dec 18 2006, 02:26 AM

No biggie.

Hey look!

A Time Loop!

SSU,

Worry not old bean, if my suppositions are correct, all particulate entities form black holes just as a matter of course (even photons); a direct consequence of trans-dimensional wave propagation.

No, I've got no problem describing everything as a singularity.

My topology is solely based on the existence of a negative and positive singularity (black and white hole.)

But a large quantity of proton sized singularities orbiting at ground level could be troublesome.

Also... under my topology, I can point to the 'Big Bang' and the End of the Universe in the Night sky.

Want to hear more?