Scientific Forums



  Replying to Life First Started On Planet Mercury?
Unregistered User Info
Enter your Name
Code Buttons
 Guided Mode
 Normal Mode 		  Close all Tags

Open Tags:   
Enter your Post
Clickable Smilies
smilie  smilie  smilie 
smilie  smilie  smilie 
smilie  smilie  smilie 
smilie  smilie  smilie 
smilie  smilie  smilie 
     
Show All

Check Post Length · BB Code Help
Confirm security code
Post Options  Enable emoticons?
 Enable signature?
Original Post to Quote
You may edit the post you are quoting here
Post Icons                                 
                                
  [ Use None ]

 



Last 10 Posts [ In reverse order ]
Robittybob1 Posted on Today at 2:57 AM
  Interesting asteroid following the Earth for a few days, sounds like it missed this time, but I like the graphics. Imagine when the Earth and planet Luna were following each other around the Earth orbit as this asteroid did for a few days. It made me feel like it it was so similar to the situation I was describing just a few days ago too. Maybe this asteroid will crash into the Moon one day.
"BREAKING NEWS!! NEO ASTEROID DISCOVERED!! 2013 KB!!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcuY65XQqfU
Robittybob1 Posted on Today at 1:55 AM
  North America and Africa covered in oceans - need more proof the Earth was once a water world!
SAHARA - How THE earth WAS made - full doc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endsc...1&v=7_5bAs9mGUY
Robittybob1 Posted on Today at 12:26 AM
  I doubt if it pressure at the mid-ocean ridges pushes the continental plates apart - that is bullcrap.
Expansion of the core of the earth makes more sense to me.
Robittybob1 Posted on Yesterday at 9:45 PM
  Pretty interesting video. Showing how it hard to get Earth rocks to solidify.
"National Geographic Colliding Continents"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCSJNBMOjJs

Some of it is different to my hypotheses so I don't accept all of it, but a lot of really good stuff about dating rocks.
Robittybob1 Posted on Yesterday at 10:03 AM
 
QUOTE (Robittybob1 @ May 25 2013, 01:31 AM)
So to recap some general discussion and the features of the Yo-yo Moon Capture theory that are yet to be resolved.
1. There has to be enough chemicals on a planet to kick start the life forming process.
2. It ends up that the rocks on the Moon are older than any discovered on the Earth!  What did this mean?
....

Looking at the first two points. The Moon had its thermal maximum at 4.4 billion years ago and completely dried out The Earth on the other hand has never completely dried out and never went through this frying time, and hence the chemicals essential for life were never completely lost.
Life gained a foothold on Earth but nothing on the Moon.
So we get old rocks on the moon for the whole place melted and resolidified but that same event didn't happen on Earth so as molten rock has welled up from below sometime later, the rocks on Earth are younger.
Just a thought, but I have seen references to scientific studies that could back this up. When I see them again I'll link to them.
Robittybob1 Posted on Yesterday at 3:58 AM
 
QUOTE (AlexG @ May 24 2013, 09:05 PM)
490 of them are bots

So tell me how these bots work please. Why do they just target the Life on Mercury Thread?
I believe they are readers for if the thread ends up on a new page with an interesting post as the first post for the page there are twice as many readers that day as they also check the last posts on the previous page, and I don't think bots would bother to do that!
Robittybob1 Posted on Yesterday at 1:31 AM
  So to recap some general discussion and the features of the Yo-yo Moon Capture theory that are yet to be resolved.
1. There has to be enough chemicals on a planet to kick start the life forming process.
2. It ends up that the rocks on the Moon are older than any discovered on the Earth! What did this mean?
3. Can the Yo-yo Moon Capture Theory allow for the Moon to become molten sometime in the past that is sufficient to account for the paucity of water in the Moon rocks?
4. What are the changes to the Moon moments after capture and changes necessary for the Moon to be in the thermal maximum at 4.4 billion years ago?
5. What must be necessary to bring both the Earth and the Moon into a position where they would be tidally locked at 3 billion years ago?
6. What effect in the Solar System would blow the massive primordial oceans off the Earth?
7. Could the eccentricity of the planets Luna and Earth orbits bring them close prior to capture. Aberrations and perturbations in the orbit will allow for a unpredictability in the orbits and would there come a time where the Earth approached Luna virtually head-on or at least such a close pass that Luna was pulsed into the orbital wave that allows it to orbit the Earth?
Beer w/Straw Posted on Yesterday at 1:16 AM
 
QUOTE (Robittybob1 @ May 24 2013, 11:57 PM)
I hope so. To me there is a incredible logic to the whole process. Remember we have gone through the whole planet building process with a seamless mechanism.
Seamless up to the point of the Moon capture. Mercury still seems like the best place have life starting.

You "hope so".

OK.
Robittybob1 Posted on May 24 2013, 11:57 PM
 
QUOTE (Beer w/Straw @ May 24 2013, 08:53 PM)
Do you think it's because of the content...

I hope so. To me there is a incredible logic to the whole process. Remember we have gone through the whole planet building process with a seamless mechanism.
Seamless up to the point of the Moon capture. Mercury still seems like the best place have life starting.
AlexG Posted on May 24 2013, 09:05 PM
  490 of them are bots
Review the complete topic (launches new window)
Terms of use
Powered by Invision Power Board(U) v.1.cust © 2003  IPS, Inc.