|LoFi version for PDAs||Help Search Members Calendar|
|Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )||Resend Validation Email|
|Guest||Posted on Dec 28 2011, 08:07 PM|
| What does your answer have to with the fact that you are wrong in the above post? You said:
Who but you thought that time is a physical dimension, and what does your babbling about clocks have to do with SUSY?
|albert2||Posted on Dec 28 2011, 01:23 PM|
tell me one case one has gone back in time ?
you can move in space only.....
time is a numerical sequence of your motion
|Guest||Posted on Dec 27 2011, 05:13 PM|
| Really? Can you even read?
Here is a quote from the very article you linked:
|albert2||Posted on Dec 27 2011, 05:06 PM|
| it seems universe is 3D
this is the end of string theory and the end of belief time is a spatial dimension
|albert2||Posted on Dec 22 2011, 07:35 PM|
| sorli and fiscaletti have some ideas on energy density of quantum vacuum and mass
|albert2||Posted on Dec 15 2011, 09:07 AM|
| Mass is an energy form of quantum vacuum in symmetry with diminished energy density of quantum vacuum. Presence of mass diminishes energy density of quantum vacuum respectively to the energy of a given mass. A given particle with a mass diminishes energy density of quantum vacuum, mass-less particle does not diminish energy of quantum vacuum. In order to explain mass of elementary particles this view does not require existence of the hypothetical boson of Higgs.